Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
It's clear from the the media coverage of both Lloyds & Barclays withdrawal of support for the BBA's appeal is a result of an arrangement with the FSA - it's been mentioned several times.
I think that any bank which doesn't disassociate itself with any appeal before the BBA decide whether to appeal or not will pay a heavy price for not doing so.
In my view those banks will be spared any fines for not implementing the measures in the Policy Statement in December as they should have. I don't think those banks will be spared the ''tough action'' the FSA promised to take on banks who erroneously suspended complaints that weren't directly related to the outcome of the Judicial Review.
This was made very clear in the FSA's letter to Trade Associations:
''We have since become aware that some firms are placing on hold nearly all of their PPI complaints, citing the Judicial Review as cause. We have also read with concern, statements made by some Trade Associations indicating that in their view, the measures contained in PS10/12 are not relevant whilst the Judicial Review is ongoing''.
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumer...ppi_letter.pdf
Oddly enough about 6 weeks prior to the publication of the letter, an internal BBA member's document - a weekly summary of banking and finance coverage in the media - mysteriously found it's way into my inbox (attached) and which stated that the FSA Policy Statement ''........didn’t matter much given most [complaints] were on hold''.
The document was duly forwarded the FSA's Whistleblower department for which a grateful response was received.
Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
the big question is what are we all going to talk about when this is all over lol
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...-authority-fsa
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
If Barclay's do throw in the towel, that is almost certainly the end as the Barclay's chairman is also chairman of the BBA.
Honestly cannot see this going to appeal, banks are not stupid (although we may think different lol) they know an appeal is a worthless exercise that will cost them dearly and as I said before when Lloyds pulled out the rest will fall like a pack of cards and that is what we are seeing.
Lets not forget the banks are under extreme pressure from the Media, Goverment, Charities, Forums, to make the right call and that is what we are seeingLast edited by pompeyfaith; 8th May 2011, 19:31:PM.
- 3 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Originally posted by di30 View PostIts not looking as strong as assumed previously. ( not that it was strong in the first place).
And the BBA as we also assumed are waiting until last minute. Luck is not on their side this time I'm afraid.....LOL
I think it was EXC that also said any appeal would be based on it's legal merits, so any banks that pull out of appeal would be irrelevant. Food for thought I guess.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Its not looking as strong as assumed previously. ( not that it was strong in the first place).
And the BBA as we also assumed are waiting until last minute. Luck is not on their side this time I'm afraid.....LOL
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Surely if two out of the big four banks withdraw from the legal action, it's game over?
I think it was EXC that said the BBA would struggle to justify an appeal for less than 50% of their members.
Where would this leave the BBA if two out of the big four banks still wanted to push on with an appeal?
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
all these cases that will be reassessed are they all old ones or cases that have also recently been rejected (pre judicial review)
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
If Barclays gives up then does that mean Egg will crack too, since they were recently acquired by Barclays? Or is it likely they'll make an independent decision? Your thoughts?
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
So it definately looks as if Barclays are pulling out.
I know I posted some info earlier, I have came across another link with this news.
HSBS and The Royal Bank of Scotland are also put under pressure.
http://www.pressassociation.com/comp...s-publications
Barclays 'to abandon PPI battle'
Barclays is set to follow its rival Lloyds Banking Group and abandon its legal fight over the mis-selling of payment protection insurance, it has been reported.
The group is expected to announce this week that it will not appeal a High Court decision on the issue, paving the way for thousands of customers who were mis-sold the policies to receive compensation, according to the Sunday Telegraph newspaper.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Exclusive: Barclays To Disclose £1.1bn PPI Provision | barclays | lloyds_banking_group | royal_bank_of_scotland | Kleinman | Sky News Blogs
Loving the last 2 paragraphs! My heart bleeds!
- 4 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
a little bit of news re rbs, it,s nothing we did,nt know but may make interesting reading (sorry ac did,nt realise you already posted this here this morning)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/n...went-bust.htmlLast edited by cappo; 8th May 2011, 18:05:PM.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Soapy,
It was widely missold and not just by the banks just about every business model sold it, credit cards, store cards, every finance house, anything on credit from retail, catalogues.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
The BBA claims on their website to 'speak for over 200 member banks from 60 countries on the full range of UK and international banking issues.'
If this is true, how many of those member banks could of been involved in the misselling of PPI?
Even if Lloyds and (now hopefully) Barclays withdraw from the legal action, could there still be quite a few banks wanting to pursue and exhaust every avenue available to them?
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Exc,
Reading those common failings it would seem that 99% of policies where missold.
For instance how many people are advised as to whether the sale is advised or non advised.
How many people are told it is optional
How many people are told that the policy would attract interest
How many people where told that the term of the loan exceeded the term of the policy or visa virsa
Plus many others.
Furthermore most of those common failings relate to ICOB and not ICOBS so loads of complaints should never have been put on hold as they did not effect the outcome of the JR
That is a very good Doc and should be read and used in conjunction with letters of complaint/claimLast edited by pompeyfaith; 8th May 2011, 17:12:PM.
- 4 likes
Leave a comment:
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Leave a comment: