Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

[debtisbad]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

There wasn't much financial news about to be honest.
There was this at the beginning of July:
Business mentoring scheme launches - Telegraph
There was the riots in August but I suspect the early part of May was fending off calls for her to resign.
Angela Knights comments being reported may well be a lot less cos the news currently is more about Libya, prior to that, the riots and unrest in the middle East, Osama Bin Laden being shot dead(not sure she was needed to comment on that either), and Bank Of England base rate has remained at 0.5%. Not many financial stories around for her to comment on in the last few months.

Maybe so, but personally I don't like her, her attitude, and whatbshe represents.

Just my personal opinion, I hope you understand.

[Turboman]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Is it just me---or am I reading it right?

FSA grants temporary extension for some PPI complaints

Re that first link Di----do you think the 16 weeks and 12 weeks are after the cutoff date--or after the claim date

IE-----if I send it on 31/8/2011 they got 16 weeks

if I send it on 1/9/2011 they got 12 weeks

If it was after the cutoff date- then claims on 1/9/2011 would take 29 weeks so that cant be right---soooooooooooooo--I dont want to get it in by end of August---but on 1st September

or am I missing something here??

Read more at: Turboman v Barclaycard PPI - Page 3 - Legal Beagles Consumer Forum

[k77mss]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

They have to deal with the complaints before the august deadline or they get fined i think....

They knew they couldn't deal with them so have sent rejection letters out on large scale.

If you were to approach them again in middle of sept to ask them to reconsider your rejection and therefore save them the 500 pounds it will cost them at the FOS then they will probably be in a postion to listen since they will have dealt with your complaint in time and also you are giving them another chance to avoid the 500 fos charge...

Just the way I see it on your case since if you were self employed and pre existing medical conditions then fairly straight forward case imo

thanxs very much for your advice yes i will do that i've nothing to lose as its in fos pile but they can only reject me again never thought of that thanxs again

[leclerc]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

No it was not. However, I eluded to the fact that after the PPI case, Angie babie went quiet for a long time and has now resurfaced with this tosh.

There wasn't much financial news about to be honest.
There was this at the beginning of July:
Business mentoring scheme launches - Telegraph
There was the riots in August but I suspect the early part of May was fending off calls for her to resign.
Angela Knights comments being reported may well be a lot less cos the news currently is more about Libya, prior to that, the riots and unrest in the middle East, Osama Bin Laden being shot dead(not sure she was needed to comment on that either), and Bank Of England base rate has remained at 0.5%. Not many financial stories around for her to comment on in the last few months.

[debtisbad]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Was the Independent article about PPI cos I missed absolutely any reference to that topic?

No it was not. However, I eluded to the fact that after the PPI case, Angie babie went quiet for a long time and has now resurfaced with this tosh.

[mosten]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

yes thats exactly what i told blackhorse on the phone last week when they rejected 2 of mines.she told me if i wasn't happy go to fos my reasons were i was self employed and have an underlying health problem but she wasn't interested so went straight on to phone to fos and put complaints in
just another way banks are keeping our money for another year or so while its with fos it stinks they should't be allowed to get away with it!

They have to deal with the complaints before the august deadline or they get fined i think....

They knew they couldn't deal with them so have sent rejection letters out on large scale.

If you were to approach them again in middle of sept to ask them to reconsider your rejection and therefore save them the 500 pounds it will cost them at the FOS then they will probably be in a postion to listen since they will have dealt with your complaint in time and also you are giving them another chance to avoid the 500 fos charge...

Just the way I see it on your case since if you were self employed and pre existing medical conditions then fairly straight forward case imo

[leclerc]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Was the Independent article about PPI cos I missed absolutely any reference to that topic?

[debtisbad]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

More squealing from our angela (wondered when we were going to hear from her again)





http://www.independent.co.uk/news/bu...d-2345670.html

Well, she was made to look a fool over the whole PPI thing-I though that they would have got rid of her after that. She has been quiet for a while, probably keeping her head low, but is back in full flow with idiotic statement like the one you gave us the link to.

[k77mss]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

lots of black horse rejection letters being sent out in last week.. might be we cant deal with them, just reject them now so we meet deadline and then go back to them after wards in couple of weeks..

yes thats exactly what i told blackhorse on the phone last week when they rejected 2 of mines.she told me if i wasn't happy go to fos my reasons were i was self employed and have an underlying health problem but she wasn't interested so went straight on to phone to fos and put complaints in
just another way banks are keeping our money for another year or so while its with fos it stinks they should't be allowed to get away with it!

[cappo]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

More squealing from our angela (wondered when we were going to hear from her again)





http://www.independent.co.uk/news/bu...d-2345670.html

[di30]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

That's a better layout than the ones I received leclerc.
I have another 2 ongoing with them now from the mis 90's, some time to go on these ones yet though, the new 16 week rule for mine lol.

So chuffed for this success, well done to you and your mum.

[leclerc]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

the scans are what LloydsTSB are sending out to successful recipients including a page on how they calculate redress.

[dogtired]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Not my domain, DT, but it does seem a bit naughty to me that the debt was sold to a DCA, who subsequently made the announcement that it was "irresolveable" (whatever that legally means !! ?) - yet Bos are apparently trying to "resolve" it to their own advantage, now.

Presumably, you have been dealing with Cabot with regard to the alleged balance owing, which they appear to have confirmed is no longer pursuable.

Then, BoS - who sold it to Cabot - appear to have re-taken 'ownership' of this alleged debt - presumably WITHOUT informing you of this 're-assignment.,' simply because it suits them as a way of reducing your PPI refund. I really don't think this can be seen as reasonable (or even lawful) conduct, as you are effectively being kicked around by whichever Tom, Dick or Harry decides they want a piece of you. That is effectively harrassment in my little book, as you are being hit by more than one pursuer simultaneously - and they are contradicting each other.

The PPI you paid was taken from you unlawfully by BoS BEFORE the debt was sold to Cabot, and as such I believe it should NOT be used to effectively repay Cabot for their sterling work in determining it to be "irresolveable." It's misappropriation to my tiny mind - and besides - it could possibly be argued that, had Bos NOT mis-sold the PPI, then the debt may well have been settled by now, instead of being passed to a DCA unnecessarily.

JMHO, though.

Thank you BK who ever said banks acted in a fair manner?
Up until last year I did not know any better but then did the CCA to Cabot.
I informed the FOS and she is going to get back to me when she can next week.
I also have a seperate complaint going to the Ombudsman about Cabots activites who again did not sent a valid CCA and told FOS we were not "allowed" to see a copy of the agreement between them and BOS.
Its all a bit of a mess and BOS are, still playing silly games, in the other that has been upheld they, at first, decided that it did not have "credit care" but "card care" now upheld but that has not stopped them trying to sell it on via Blair OLiver Scott to Robinson Way now on "hold" apparently until they can caluclate the refund, you just could not make it up!
DT xx

[dogtired]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

Bump

[Bill-K]

Re: Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......

...I got a letter last week saying they now considered it "irresolvable" ?! What happens now?:beagle:
xxDT

Not my domain, DT, but it does seem a bit naughty to me that the debt was sold to a DCA, who subsequently made the announcement that it was "irresolveable" (whatever that legally means !! ?) - yet Bos are apparently trying to "resolve" it to their own advantage, now.

Presumably, you have been dealing with Cabot with regard to the alleged balance owing, which they appear to have confirmed is no longer pursuable.

Then, BoS - who sold it to Cabot - appear to have re-taken 'ownership' of this alleged debt - presumably WITHOUT informing you of this 're-assignment.,' simply because it suits them as a way of reducing your PPI refund. I really don't think this can be seen as reasonable (or even lawful) conduct, as you are effectively being kicked around by whichever Tom, Dick or Harry decides they want a piece of you. That is effectively harrassment in my little book, as you are being hit by more than one pursuer simultaneously - and they are contradicting each other.

The PPI you paid was taken from you unlawfully by BoS BEFORE the debt was sold to Cabot, and as such I believe it should NOT be used to effectively repay Cabot for their sterling work in determining it to be "irresolveable." It's misappropriation to my tiny mind - and besides - it could possibly be argued that, had Bos NOT mis-sold the PPI, then the debt may well have been settled by now, instead of being passed to a DCA unnecessarily.

JMHO, though.