Originally posted by Footynut
View Post
Latest Update on PPI Judicial Review - NO APPEAL - get your claims in......
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
the hearing was 2 parts. permission to request JR then the JR itself, hes effectively saying BBA were allowed to have JR but that he dismisses it having heard and considered both sides argument.
- 5 likes
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
I grant permission to argue all 3 grounds but dismiss them.
What does this mean??
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Still on hold??:tinysmile_cry_t:Originally posted by di30 View PostDirectly from the BBA website.
“
“Any complaints that are directly affected by the judicial review and therefore can not be decided will continue to be placed on hold until the next steps have been decided. ”
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Directly from the BBA website.
http://www.bba.org.uk/media/article/...udicial-review
Judgement handed down on BBA judicial review
“On behalf of its members, the BBA requested a judicial review of the way in which the industry should handle complaints about PPI sales, as set out in the Financial Services Authority's policy statement.
“Whilst the UK banking industry has to date implemented every reform on PPI sales and complaints handling required by the regulators, the additional requirements in the policy statement effectively apply new standards to past sales, which we believe go beyond the rules and regulatory requirements which were developed by the regulator over time.
“It was due to the widespread concerns that the FSA and the Financial Ombudsman Service had not properly applied the law in this area – and only having exhausted all other avenues for resolving the underlying dispute that a judicial review was sought.
“We are disappointed with today’s judgment and now need to consider the details of it very carefully as well as next steps, including whether it would be appropriate to apply for permission to appeal.
“Any complaints that are directly affected by the judicial review and therefore can not be decided will continue to be placed on hold until the next steps have been decided. We will continue to work closely with the FSA to ensure that all complaints are appropriately handled and customers are not disadvantaged. Customers who are considering making a complaint or who have a specific query about an existing complaint should contact their bank in the first instance.”
- 5 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
attached
Case No: CO/10619/2010Neutral Citation Number: [2011] EWHC 999 (Admin)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 20/04/2011
Before :MR JUSTICE OUSELEY- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Between :
THE QUEEN on the application of BRITISH BANKERS ASSOCIATIONClaimant
- and -
(1) THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY(2) THE FINANCIAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE
- and –
NEMO PERSONAL FINANCE LTDDefendantsInterested Party
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lord Pannick QC and Mr C Flint QCMr J Herberg and Mr S Pritchard (instructed byFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) for the ClaimantMr M Brindle QC and Miss M Carss-Frisk QCMr R Coleman and Mr J McClelland (instructed by SNR Denton UK LLP) for the First DefendantMr Hodge Malek QC and Mr J Strachan (instructed by Russell Cooke LLP) for the Second DefendantMr M Fordham QC and Mr P Luckhurst (instructed by Herbert Smith LLP) for the Interested PartyHearing dates: 25th, 26, 27th and 28th January 2011Approved Judgment- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
......
Overall conclusions
1. I grant permission to argue all three grounds, but dismiss them.
- 15 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
good old duncan,spot on
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.u...judicialreview
sorry if some one already posted this but there is a lot to sift through.
Seems the banks can appeal, yet M and S have just sent me the ppi form to fill in?
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
As on FSA website.
http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/...2011/039.shtml
FSA welcomes the High Court's dismissal of the BBA's judicial review of new PPI complaints handling measures.
FSA/PN/039/2011
20 April 2011
We welcome the High Court’s dismissal of the British Bankers’ Association’s (BBA) and Nemo Personal Finance Limited’s (Nemo) legal challenge to our payment protection insurance (PPI) measures.
Our primary aim has always been to get proper redress, once and for all, for those with genuine complaints.
We believe this decision signals the end of years of poor complaint handling and will trigger a dramatic improvement in the way customers are treated when complaining.
There have been more than 1.5 million complaints made about PPI since the Financial Services Authority (FSA) took over regulation of it in 2005. On average, firms have rejected around 60% of the complaints made to them, but some rejected almost all of them. However, the vast majority of complaints referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service (the Ombudsman) are found in the consumer’s favour.
However this is not the end of the process: the BBA and Nemo may seek to appeal the court’s judgment.
The FSA has not put a waiver in place so firms must continue to deal with complaints where possible, including letting customers know they can refer their complaint to the Ombudsman if they are unable to progress it.
Failure to do so may result in Enforcement action.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Originally posted by pompeyfaith View PostDi,
That was my take in a previous post.
LOL, see I don't even know what I'm doing with all this excitement :tinysmile_aha_t:
LOL, hope it lasts though. x
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
Originally posted by pompeyfaith View PostWell its going to be a nice weekend so I'm off to B&Q to invest in a new barbeque be back later folks.
I don't blame you PF, you go for it hun
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
This is fantastic news - Ousley pulled his finger out!
CT
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Well its going to be a nice weekend so I'm off to B&Q to invest in a new barbeque be back later folks.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
If you see the FOS statement earlier in the thread, they more or less state that they are being obstructive. However, the FSA can take enforcement action but I suspect that they will await the decision as to whether the banks will appeal which we should find out about by May 10th.Originally posted by furnivalljo View PostStatement from the FSA Website
The FSA has not put a waiver in place so firms must continue to deal with complaints where possible, including letting customers know they can refer their complaint to the Ombudsman if they are unable to progress it.
Failure to do so may result in Enforcement action.
Like you have been doing for the past 6 months, Mr FSA
------------------------------- merged -------------------------------
To clarify, here is what the FOS stated:
"The lack of cooperation from some financial businesses has made it difficult to progress PPI cases since this legal challenge was launched. However, the clear-cut judgment means that banks and other financial businesses should now be in the position to deal promptly, efficiently and fairly with their customers' PPI complaints."
- 3 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Di,Halifax have started to pay out though that were previously held up due to the JR, so wonder if they knew something then perhaps?
That was my take in a previous post.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
Statement from the FSA Website
The FSA has not put a waiver in place so firms must continue to deal with complaints where possible, including letting customers know they can refer their complaint to the Ombudsman if they are unable to progress it.
Failure to do so may result in Enforcement action.
Like you have been doing for the past 6 months, Mr FSA
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Latest updates on PPI Judicial Review and claims on hold
also its my understanding that its the banks who will be reviewing their own sales to decide whether redress is appropriate, what are the odds they find most were fine (at least until the FSA are forced to jump in and start to enforce indipendent/impartial reviews)Originally posted by mosten View PostAnyone know if they have to contact all their past customers off their own back now also..?
Leave a comment:
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Leave a comment: