Momentum Network / CCK

[hunter_01]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

Don't take it personally Hunter. Lots of people get moderated or bannned from CAG for no apparent reason, or reasons best known to the site team. I haven't read any of your postings on CAG. Have you asked them why you've been moderated?

Sent them an email , no response.

Anybody got any ideas how I can find out why I was moderated?

There is no real info of what to do in such a situation,

If anyone can provide any help I'd be much obliged

[WendyB]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

Don't take it personally Hunter. Lots of people get moderated or bannned from CAG for no apparent reason, or reasons best known to the site team. I haven't read any of your postings on CAG. Have you asked them why you've been moderated?

[hunter_01]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

Unfortunately it appears that Hunter-01 may no longer be able to respond. Last post on here was 31st December and last post on Cag was on 1st January. New member registered on Cag today under the name HunterWasGagged.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...r.php?u=281368

Could just be by Cag, as he is under moderation, but maybe he's had his wrists slapped and been told to stop posting by the powers that be.






CJ

I've not been moderated on here which is very pleasing. I've not posted on here as I've been posting on the CAG site.

They have gagged me on there which seems very very strange.

I've not been rude, never sworn or showed aggression but I'm being prevented from posting.

Has anyone got any idea why?

Perhaps the powers that be don't want the truth to be revealed.

If my points were of no legal basis and I was talking complete rubbish then I'm no threat to the banks.

But I've been gagged.

Very very strange

[Amethyst]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

lol ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, good good then

[calamity jane]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

But that shouldn't stop him positng here, should it? We don't mod people at the drop of a hat do we?

Nope Hunter has definately not been moderated/banned etc on here, nor has anyone else from this thread. We don't do that without extremely good reason.

Oops didn't mean he'd been moderated here meant his bosses:o



CJ

[Amethyst]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

Nope Hunter has definately not been moderated/banned etc on here, nor has anyone else from this thread. We don't do that without extremely good reason.

[WendyB]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

But that shouldn't stop him positng here, should it? We don't mod people at the drop of a hat do we?

[calamity jane]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

Any real evidence for that?

That is what seems to be clearly lacking here.

There is no substantive evidence out there to back up these claims, and until there is, then the label "scam" seems fair?

CCK/Hunter, put up or shut up?

Prove your case with real verifiable examples......

Unfortunately it appears that Hunter-01 may no longer be able to respond. Last post on here was 31st December and last post on Cag was on 1st January. New member registered on Cag today under the name HunterWasGagged.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...r.php?u=281368

Could just be by Cag, as he is under moderation, but maybe he's had his wrists slapped and been told to stop posting by the powers that be.






CJ

[Nibbler]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

The court agrees and tells the lender to bog off and sue Basil.
Lender sues Basil instead.

Any real evidence for that?

That is what seems to be clearly lacking here.

There is no substantive evidence out there to back up these claims, and until there is, then the label "scam" seems fair?

CCK/Hunter, put up or shut up?

Prove your case with real verifiable examples......

[Amethyst]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

lol try me best, but have to actually understand things myself before I can get them in PIL for everyone else. Am trying to get these POCs and letters in PIL too but must say its bloody hard work when law is pretty much about word play.

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

You borrow money off a lender.
You spend said money.
You decide you can't pay it back, so you sell the debt on to Basil (paying him £450 plus 10% of the debt) to get it off your back
Basil doesn't repay the debt either and negotiates with bank for a reduced F&F settlement.
Bank doesnt play ball or recognise Basil owns debt so sues YOU.
YOU defend saying Basil owns the debt. (then it goes hypothetical as its not yet been proven in court)
The court agrees and tells the lender to bog off and sue Basil.
Lender sues Basil instead.
Basil negotiates reduced F&F or claims loan unenforceable by virtue of CCA 1974, or pays up.

that make more sense?

Thats fantastic Ame, yes its makes total sense now.

Do you see what I mean when I keep going on about PIL now ? Just think of all those people out there who would/could understand/feel better about things if everything was in PIL.

[Amethyst]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

I think that the UCA Claims Management Companies work same way btw.

They have to wait for lender to take legal action against debtor then they step in and defend case. Look at the case laws, the majority are DEFENCE arguments.

Thats why some say carry on paying lender, making u hang about thinking they are doing some kind of claim for unenforceability (which u cant actually do), when really they are just holding on to your money waiting for when you cant pay any more and the bank sues you.

Some CMCs will try to negotiate F&F's on dodgy credit agreements before it gets to stage of lender taking you to court.

(ummm so yep what people here do)

[Amethyst]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

You borrow money off a lender.
You spend said money.
You decide you can't pay it back, so you sell the debt on to Basil (paying him £450 plus 10% of the debt) to get it off your back
Basil doesn't repay the debt either and negotiates with bank for a reduced F&F settlement.
Bank doesnt play ball or recognise Basil owns debt so sues YOU.
YOU defend saying Basil owns the debt. (then it goes hypothetical as its not yet been proven in court)
The court agrees and tells the lender to bog off and sue Basil.
Lender sues Basil instead.
Basil negotiates reduced F&F or claims loan unenforceable by virtue of CCA 1974, or pays up.

that make more sense?

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

Have I got this right?:-

A (Lender) & B (Borrower) sign a contract; C agrees (for a fee) to 'buy' B's side of the agreement.
A or B can terminate (A must terminate if they want to bring B to court)
The instant the contract between A & B is terminated, C's agreement with B becomes legally binding, & A has to deal with C.
But B has the money?
Am I missing something here?

Christ this is better than a game of Cluedo, can we please, please have some PIL so that everyone can understand.

[charitynjw]

Re: Momentum Network / CCK

Have I got this right?:-

A (Lender) & B (Borrower) sign a contract; C agrees (for a fee) to 'buy' B's side of the agreement.
A or B can terminate (A must terminate if they want to bring B to court)
The instant the contract between A & B is terminated, C's agreement with B becomes legally binding, & A has to deal with C.
But B has the money?
Am I missing something here?