Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Thanks Ame, I understand what you are saying but not withstanding yje fact I still have to get the AQ in on Monday, this is worrying me tremendously.

Also, Halifax have already accepted our hardship on 100% basis, so it is the limitations act we have to get the hearing based on the limitations part of the claim. This is what makes our claim interesting.

As far as GLO is concerned we are awaiting confirmation from EXC as to whether it is only peeps that are eligible for the free legal aid that can be included in this action, according to what he said on the thread if we are not eligible for Legal Aid, we may not be able to join. Although funnily enough we meet the Hardship Criterea.

Can someone please help me word Q 'G' for the AQ as soon as possible.

Many thanks
xx

Okay so you put into Halifax for hardship they only offered the £28 that was in the limitations period. I think it will be a lot of time effort and money to try and get this heard. Your hardship is only borderline and not enough for a court to intervene, the issues are subject to the test case, the limitations period will come after that, unless theres any further repo threat or major issue occured since the last claim, I think you would be a lot better just accepting the stay and joining the GLO for the limitations issues. I assume its in small claims so the fee would be £35.

I will try and get hold of Budgie see if he had some miraculous plan tho.

[Amethyst]

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Okay so you put into Halifax for hardship they only offered the £28 that was in the limitations period. I think it will be a lot of time effort and money to try and get this heard. Your hardship is only borderline and not enough for a court to intervene, the issues are subject to the test case, the limitations period will come after that, unless theres any further repo threat or major issue occured since the last claim, I think you would be a lot better just accepting the stay and joining the GLO for the limitations issues. I assume its in small claims so the fee would be £35.

I will try and get hold of Budgie see if he had some miraculous plan tho.

[Amethyst]

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Q 'G' is the other information bit.

What have you put on the rest honey? and stop panicing

Right - Halifax have asked for a stay in their defence ? so you are entering your AQ to say you don't want a stay due to hardship yes?

I don't think you will get around a stay tbh am going for a read back through your thread though.

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

SOS.... help needed urgently with Q.'G' on AQ

anyone who can help please!

Ta xxx

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

HELP - Budgie, I am stuck on Q.G on AQ - help now urgently needed as I have to get it in by MONDAY 29th, I would like to getvit completed over the weekend.

Ta muchly....
xxxxxxx

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Thanks again Tools, that helps us and gives us the basis for the straightforward questions A-F

Unfortunately. we still need to know exactly what to put in 'G' as we know that Budgie has promised to help as this is not a straightforward bank charge claim as you know this is 18 years of charges and limitations and hardship all together. We do not want to leave any stone unturned and we want to get it as tight as we can.



xx

[Tools]

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

N149?

If so look in Allocation Questionnaire Guide - N149(Small Claims Track)

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Thanks Tools for that bit of advice, but what I am more concerned about is the AQ which has to be done before next weekend and delivered to the court.

Budgie has promised to help me with this and now the days are running out fast and I really do not have a clue with what I have to do to complete the AQ!

XXX

[Tools]

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

The Defence states in para 3, that they will file a full defence within 28 days of the expiration of the stay in proceedings..

What does that mean!
Tuttsi xx

As Curly says, nothing to worry about, all they are saying is that once the stay is lifted on completion of the test case they intend to defend in full. Halifax are notoriously crap at defending anyway Tuttsi and in the main are the first to give up easily.

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Thanks Bud, looking forward to dealing with this ASAP.

xx

[Budgie]

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

I will give you a hand with this in the morning Tuttsi.

Sorry I have had computer problems for couple of days.

Budgie

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Thanks Curly, but whats does para 3 mean! it don't mean nowt to me!

Also, I will need help on the AQ, I do not have long to do it either and not good at this legal stuff.

xx

[Curlyben]

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Nowt to worry about really, simply trying to scare you.

I would object to the proposed stay though.
Screw em go for the throat

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

Help!!!!

Re: Tuttsi V Halifax ( 18 year claim )

I have attached the letter and the 'Defence'...

The Defence states in para 3, that they will file a full defence within 28 days of the expiration of the stay in proceedings..

What does that mean!

What do I ned to do now for AQ.

Thanks

Tuttsi xx