Query for nemesis please

[winner12]

Hi
ref my thread I'm so stressed
Amended tax return for the business miles recalculated by HMRC they owe us about £400 but on the first self assesment page before you pick your tax year it says in red figures £2500 over due pay now so not sure why it's there if on the statement no tax is owed bit confusing

[Kati]

Re: Query for nemesis please

tagging [MENTION=55034]nemesis45[/MENTION] xx

[winner12]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Thanks again Kati

[nemesis45]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Hello Winner,
Bloody stupid confusing forms!!

I would be asking for a full break down and explanation on how this has been arrived at.

Plain incompetence I suspect Winner.

nem

[winner12]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Hello Winner,
Bloody stupid confusing forms!!

I would be asking for a full break down and explanation on how this has been arrived at.

Plain incompetence I suspect Winner.

nem

Thanks
Honest words of wisdom I have looked at the figures I think he might have paid the higher child benefit twice once for the original and then again for the amendment at a lower figure I would have thought the online balancing statement would have corrected the figures

[nemesis45]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Thanks
Honest words of wisdom I have looked at the figures I think he might have paid the higher child benefit twice once for the original and then again for the amendment at a lower figure I would have thought the online balancing statement would have corrected the figures

Hello Winner,

As usual the computer depends on the accuracy of the data entered by the muppet at the key board!

nem

[winner12]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Well HMRC say the figure should populate across and it should wipe out the red figure what a laugh any thoughts

[nemesis45]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Well HMRC say the figure should populate across and it should wipe out the red figure what a laugh any thoughts

HeeeeeeeeeeLP what hell is that supposed to mean?? to me it says fill out every para and page and it'll be alright in the end.

nem

[winner12]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Haha god help us it's a joke they have hounded us and another laugh he found a letter stating how his car would effect his tax from his HR dept clearly stating copy sent to HMRC they have denied all along they held any info with regard to his coding what a load of rubbish advice is stick with it and fight them hard

[nemesis45]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Haha god help us it's a joke they have hounded us and another laugh he found a letter stating how his car would effect his tax from his HR dept clearly stating copy sent to HMRC they have denied all along they held any info with regard to his coding what a load of rubbish advice is stick with it and fight them hard

I really get the impression that HMRC recruit from the realms of the terminally bewildered and then infect tax payers who gradually lose the will to live!:deadhorse:

[winner12]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Morning
Head spinning silly question if earnings is say £58,000
Do you reduce that by the tax free amount say £10,000 and then pay tax on £48,000 HMRC are totally bonkers after doing our own version of the tax calculation they have added an underpayment figure of nearly £3000 that should not even be on this amendment please take me away it's sending me bonkers too

[nemesis45]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Morning
Head spinning silly question if earnings is say £58,000
Do you reduce that by the tax free amount say £10,000 and then pay tax on £48,000 HMRC are totally bonkers after doing our own version of the tax calculation they have added an underpayment figure of nearly £3000 that should not even be on this amendment please take me away it's sending me bonkers too

Income - tax free amount then 20% up to limit 40% on the rest ??

nem

[winner12]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Here are the figures
employment 54,257
Benefits 8,695
expenses -6,000
Total 56,952
Personal A -10,000

Tax due on 46,952
31,865 @20% = 6,373
15,087@40% =6,034
Tax charged 12,407
Underpaid 78
Child benefit charge 1,707
Income tax due 14,193
Tax deducted 11,619
underpaid tax 2,897 no idea why the tax is so high
Tax deducted 14,516
Overpaid 322
About as clear as mud

[winner12]

Re: Query for nemesis please

I must say from my stressed out post the original underpayment was for nearly 6,500 he had not claimed his milage expenses which amounted to 6,000 but he still has a underpaid tax amount for 2014/2015 added into the above figure

[nemesis45]

Re: Query for nemesis please

Here are the figures
employment 54,257
Benefits 8,695
expenses -6,000
Total 56,952
Personal A -10,000

Tax due on 46,952
31,865 @20% = 6,373
15,087@40% =6,034
Tax charged 12,407
Underpaid 78
Child benefit charge 1,707
Income tax due 14,193
Tax deducted 11,619
underpaid tax 2,897 no idea why the tax is so high
Tax deducted 14,516
Overpaid 322
About as clear as mud

Hello Winner,

It's bloody confusing!+

Are they by any chance collecting an underpayment by issuing a lower tax code? It's the only thing I can think of.

nem