Re: Swift Advance After Repo
hi all
latest update is that the hearing didn't go ahead as Swift thought it was a waste of court time and money so the matter has gone to trial with agreement from both sides.
Swift also suggested that they case be stayed for a month in order to agree to a settlement but as of yet not heard anything
Swift Advance After Repo
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
I agree. An update would be good and helpful to others in a similar situation.Originally posted by meellis View PostIs there any news regarding this thread at all, everything is quiet yet the court date must have been passed.
Di
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
Is there any news regarding this thread at all, everything is quiet yet the court date must have been passed.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
hi everyone
just a quick update........
just recieved SAR documents
also wanted to you wish you all a very happy merry christmas
- 4 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
In absolute agreementOriginally posted by meellis View PostThe other thing to consider is that even though there might not have been a requirement for swift to inform of costs/charges prior to 2008 through CCA they seem to have produced the requirement through their own T & C's.
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
The other thing to consider is that even though there might not have been a requirement for swift to inform of costs/charges prior to 2008 through CCA they seem to have produced the requirement through their own T & C's.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
MeellisOriginally posted by meellis View PostYou know, to a silver tongued barrister the argument is as broad as it is long. The obvious charges you have marked z are easier to argue but I would really question the wording on the terms. "have to pay them or decide to charge them" reads very questionably if you dissect it. Have to pay them infers you know how much they are being charged and the exact date they will pay them which due to terms they could have could be any date between invoice date and terms set date (maybe up to 90days). Decide to charge them to me infers that even though you might know the cost of a management charge from the tariff for instance you do not know when or if they will decide to charge it which to me renders the Tariff worthless.
I agree absolutely.
Regards
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
You know, to a silver tongued barrister the argument is as broad as it is long. The obvious charges you have marked z are easier to argue but I would really question the wording on the terms. "have to pay them or decide to charge them" reads very questionably if you dissect it. Have to pay them infers you know how much they are being charged and the exact date they will pay them which due to terms they could have could be any date between invoice date and terms set date (maybe up to 90days). Decide to charge them to me infers that even though you might know the cost of a management charge from the tariff for instance you do not know when or if they will decide to charge it which to me renders the Tariff worthless.
- 1 thank
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
I would ask Swift for copies of invoices from the solicitors they used. When I was in court the judge asked the barrister how much he was charging £500.00 an hr!! Swift will add on what they want without explanation. They won't send them but it will be more ammunition for you in court.
TINKS XX
- 4 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
Date
Reason
Amount
No of Days
Interest
Acc Bal
Pay at 11.16%
26/02/07
Management Charge
70.00
3552
75.97
26/03/07
Management Charge
70.00
3524
75.37
26/04/07
Management Charge
70.00
3493
74.71
29/05/07
Management Charge
70.00
3460
74.00
29/06/07
Management Charge
70.00
3429
73.34
30/07/07
Management Charge
70.00
3398
72.68
30/08/07
Management Charge
70.00
3367
72.01
02/10/07
Management Charge
70.00
3334
71.31
26/10/07
Management Charge
65.00
3310
65.74
02/11/07
Management Charge
70.00
3303
70.64
04/12/07
Management Charge
35.00
3271
34.98
27/05/08
Management Charge
35.00
3096
33.11
27/06/08
Management Charge
70.00
3065
65.55
28/07/08
Management Charge
70.00
3034
64.89
28/08/08
Management Charge
70.00
3003
64.23
29/09/08
Management Charge
70.00
2971
63.54
29/10/08
Management Charge
70.00
2941
62.90
02/12/08
Management Charge
70.00
2907
62.17
05/01/09
Management Charge
35.00
2873
30.72
19,262.15
325.98
05/02/09
Management Charge
35.00
2842
30.39
18,949.45
323.09
05/03/09
Management Charge
35.00
2814
30.09
18,909.04
324.87
26/10/09
Management Charge
35.00
2579
27.58
26/11/09
Management Charge
70.00
2548
54.50
29/12/09
Management Charge
70.00
2515
53.79
03/02/10
Management Charge
64.00
2479
48.48
03/03/10
Management Charge
64.00
2451
47.93
03/04/10
Management Charge
64.00
2420
47.32
03/05/10
Management Charge
64.00
2390
46.74
03/06/10
Management Charge
64.00
2359
46.13
03/07/10
Management Charge
64.00
2329
45.54
03/08/10
Management Charge
64.00
2298
44.94
03/09/10
Management Charge
64.00
2267
44.33
03/10/10
Management Charge
64.00
2237
43.74
03/11/10
Management Charge
64.00
2206
43.14
11/01/11
Management Charge
64.00
2137
41.79
11/02/11
Management Charge
64.00
2106
41.18
11/03/11
Management Charge
64.00
2078
40.63
11/04/11
Management Charge
64.00
2047
40.03
11/05/11
Management Charge
64.00
2017
39.44
11/06/11
Management Charge
64.00
1986
38.84
11/09/11
Management Charge
64.00
1894
37.04
11/12/11
Management Charge
64.00
1803
35.26
11/01/12
Management Charge
64.00
1772
34.65
23,822.94 591.03
11/02/12
Management Charge
64.00
1741
34.04
11/05/12
Management Charge
64.00
1651
32.28
11/06/12
Management Charge
64.00
1620
31.68
11/08/12
Management Charge
64.00
1559
30.49
11/11/12
Management Charge
64.00
1467
28.69
11/12/12
Management Charge
64.00
1437
28.10
11/01/13
Management Charge
64.00
1406
27.49
26,550.99 817.23
11/02/13
Management Charge
64.00
1375
26.89
11/03/13
Management Charge
64.00
1347
26.34
11/04/13
Management Charge
64.00
1316
25.73
11/05/13
Management Charge
64.00
1286
25.15
11/06/13
Management Charge
64.00
1255
24.54
11/07/13
Management Charge
64.00
1225
23.95
06/08/13
Management Charge
30.00
1199
10.99
11/11/13
Management Charge
64.00
1102
21.55
11/12/13
Management Charge
64.00
1072
20.96
11/01/14
Management Charge
64.00
1041
20.36
30,115.87
1,269.00
11/07/14
Management Charge
70.00
860
18.39
11/08/14
Management Charge
70.00
829
17.73
11/09/14
Management Charge
70.00
798
17.07
11/01/15
Management Charge
70.00
676
14.46
29,768.23
2,137.69
11/03/15
Management Charge
70.00
617
13.20
26/03/15
Management Charge Reversed
602
0.00
11/04/15
Management Charge
70.00
586
12.53
11/09/15
Management Charge
70.00
433
9.26
11/11/15
Management Charge
70.00
372
7.96
11/12/15
Management Charge
70.00
342
7.31
11/01/16
Management Charge
70.00
311
6.65
11/02/16
Management Charge
70.00
280
5.99
11/03/16
Management Charge
70.00
251
5.37
11/04/16
Management Charge
70.00
220
4.71
09/05/16
Management Charge Reversed
192
0.00
02/06/16
Management Charge Reversed
168
0.00
4,645.00
2,791.21
4,435.00
2,767.93
Is this easy enough to follow? See Post 229.
RegardsLast edited by Determined; 3rd December 2016, 12:00:PM.
- 3 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
Hi Sofi
I submit this for your information as a discussion point with your representative
I have been taking a closer look at the costs and charges added to this account and would make these observations.
In general terms in Key Information within the Agreement the following charges are specifically mentioned
a) Arrears and default letters sent and received, phone calls with you & third parties 23.00
b) Account management- active management where arrears 70.00
c) Account management- monitored where payment arrangement 35.00
d) Unpaid direct debit, standing order or returned cheque 33.00
e) Building Insurance administration fees where you cancel cover 95.00
f) Administration charges for instructing solicitors 75.00
g) Dealing with legal action-review pre-action 100.00
h) Default administration fee where account 2 months in arrears for 1st time 250.00
i) Default administration fee where account 2 months in arrears each sub time 110.00
j) Ground rent/service charge arrears –where leasehold 90.00
k) Visit to property for arrears or occupancy check 95.00
l) Instruct Solicitors for warrant 100.00
m) Dealing with eviction 100.00
n) Eviction cancellation 100.00
o) Possession taken 250.00
And very importantly the agreement states;
p) You may also be liable for any other reasonable costs, charges and expenses we incur or pay to a third party, including legal costs which arise out of your breach of the agreement.
All of the above attract interest if not paid ‘AT THAT DATE’ when Swift have to pay them or decide to charge them.
These are the charges, that I have identified, under the general banner LEGAL.
Date Reason Type Amount Disbursement Contract No of Days Obvious Interest 09/03/07 Letter before Action Legal 75.00 f 3541 81.14 26/03/07 Issue Legal 100.00 g 3524 107.67 30/03/07 Issue Fee Legal 150.00 yes y 3520 161.33 17/05/07 Solicitors Agents Fee Legal 82.25 p 3472 87.25 23/07/07 W1 Letter sent Legal 100.00 l 3405 104.04 23/07/07 Warrant Fee Legal 95.00 yes y 3405 98.83 05/09/07 Eviction cancelled Legal 100.00 n 3361 102.69 10/09/07 Solicitors Agents Fee Legal 82.50 p 3356 84.59 25/09/07 Cancelled repossession Legal 117.50 z 3341 119.95 12/11/07 Solicitors Agents Fee Legal 82.25 p 3293 82.76 29/11/07 Eviction cancelled Legal 100.00 n 3276 100.09 06/12/07 Solicitors Agents Fee Legal 82.50 p 3269 82.40 07/12/07 Cancelled repossession Legal 117.50 z 3268 117.32 21/09/08 Litigation charges Legal 1,721.40 p 2979 1,566.82 26/09/08 Litigation charges Legal 381.90 p 2974 347.02 25/11/08 Litigation charges Legal 211.50 p 2914 188.31 25/11/08 Warrant Issued Legal 100.00 l 2914 89.03 26/11/08 Warrant Fee Legal 95.00 yes y 2913 84.55 27/01/09 Eviction cancelled Legal 100.00 n 2851 87.11 30/01/09 Cancelled repossession Legal 28.75 z 2848 25.02 04/03/13 Warrant Review Legal 75.00 z 1354 31.03 16/08/13 Solicitors Fees Legal 800.00 p 1189 290.63 30/09/13 Solicitors Fees Legal 165.00 p 1144 57.67 22/04/16 Litigation charges Legal 75.00 p 209 4.79 03/06/16 Solicitors Fees Legal 27.00 p 167 1.38 12/07/16 Solicitors Fees Legal 493.00 p 128 19.28 17/08/16 Solicitors Fees Legal 144.00 p 92 4.05 26/08/16 Solicitors Fees Legal 84.00 p 83 2.13 5,786.05 4,128.90
Which of these costs would a lay person expect to have been paid.
How could you possibly know about the cost of a 'Solicitor' unless it was expressly pointed out to you?
The sums in the column under Contract marked z are not mentioned in the key information so how could you be aware?
Would a lay person understand disbursements unless specifically told.? (Indicated by letter y)
Who decides what is reasonable, in relation to legal costs, if you are never in a position to challenge them?
I have some observations on Admin costs which will follow.
The chart that follows shows Management Charges. The figure that sits alongside the account balance is the monthly sum that would need to be paid in order to discharge the loan within the loan period. I have used the interest rate of 11.16% purely for demonstration purposes. I know the sum was higher. I have selected certain dates, a) when an agreement must have been in place because of the fee charged and b) anniversary dates at the turn of the year
Unless Swift were continually articulating the point and confirming on a monthly basis exactly what was happening these were not 'Management Charges' but simply another shovel full of soil designed to bury the borrower,
The figures are not penny perfect but are for illustration purposes. They will be but a few pence out.
Regards
Last edited by Determined; 3rd December 2016, 12:06:PM.
- 4 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
yes plz sparkieOriginally posted by Sparkie1723 View PostSofi, Pt can't do that he would be not only breaking the site rules but his position as a Legal Executive.............I can recommend a very good one but the firm is in Liverpool. There is also one in Leigh Lancashire
I can e.mail you their names if you would like me to.
Sparkie
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
You are right we are going off on a tangent, thing is I believe there are a load more sofi's about to enter this world. Companies like Swift based business more around long term loans so I believe more people are going to find they haven't cleared as much as the thought off of their loans now more will be coming to term. Fred will back this up probably with first plus victims. There will be a market for solutions so solutions need to be found.
- 3 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
Apologies to sofi I am going off at too much of a tangent....... must get this thread back on her track. She will be getting confused if I don't
Sparkie
- 3 likes
Leave a comment:
-
Re: Swift Advance After Repo
I understand more than anyone matey that's why I wrote that open letter to the media ...I am just a couple of steps away to showing the Bexhill case will batter them ......and the media is the way I can get it if one of them takes the bait I've dangled in front of themOriginally posted by meellis View PostThat's the thing Sparks, they are borrowing against debts like yours and Sofis, book assets when they might be unable to realise them. At some point soon I need to up the ante on my situation so I need to decide whether to proceed un aided or to find some battle hardened veterans as it were.
I had hoped pt would read it to see what I have discovered.
Sparkie
- 2 likes
Leave a comment:
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Leave a comment: