Re: Legal clause for selling, assigning, or transferring account to third party
Thats the whole point HW there are always a lot of IFS . If a good DN has been issued, if LPA has been followed, IF the CCA request is compliant .
However I see where walesman is coming from , it is business and much as I don't like it , people are in business to make a profit. You do not think twice about paying £4 for a bottle of WKD in a bar that can be bought from a supermarket for 99p or £4.50 for a glass of wine when the whole bottle cost less than that.
More and more debts since 2007 have been enforceable however I have had more sucess in getting post 2007 debts written off than I have with pre 2007 debts . Most of my PDL's are gone after following complaints through to the FOS etc about irresponsible lending, bad practice etc. £1200 to Lowells gone for a credit card -with no DN .
I noticed tha actual NOA was addressed to "who it may concern" I think thy have royally screwed up and the DN is defective BUT these can be put right , if only the OC had screwed up with the DN before sale
My understanding of the insolvency rules is that part 11 is about the sharing out of proceeds to creditors of insolvent companies so I still do not see what that has got to do with a NOA http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1...4/part/11/made
Thats the whole point HW there are always a lot of IFS . If a good DN has been issued, if LPA has been followed, IF the CCA request is compliant .
However I see where walesman is coming from , it is business and much as I don't like it , people are in business to make a profit. You do not think twice about paying £4 for a bottle of WKD in a bar that can be bought from a supermarket for 99p or £4.50 for a glass of wine when the whole bottle cost less than that.
More and more debts since 2007 have been enforceable however I have had more sucess in getting post 2007 debts written off than I have with pre 2007 debts . Most of my PDL's are gone after following complaints through to the FOS etc about irresponsible lending, bad practice etc. £1200 to Lowells gone for a credit card -with no DN .
I noticed tha actual NOA was addressed to "who it may concern" I think thy have royally screwed up and the DN is defective BUT these can be put right , if only the OC had screwed up with the DN before sale
My understanding of the insolvency rules is that part 11 is about the sharing out of proceeds to creditors of insolvent companies so I still do not see what that has got to do with a NOA http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1...4/part/11/made
Comment