Re: advice please on a loan that was taken 12 years ago
If there was neither any written (or emailed) acknowledgement of the alleged debt, nor any payment made by you (or by someone acting on your behalf) between January 2005 and January 2011, no subsequent payment can revive that cause of action. They might not like that and they might even prefer to ignore it, but that is the law - Limitation Act 1980, section 29, paragraph 7. Were they to try to sue, they'd need to prove that there had been some written or emailed acknowledgement between January 2005 and January 2011, or payment made towards the alleged debt between those dates.
You do not need to prove anything.
For them to claim that a payment made in July 2011 has somehow prevented the debt from becoming Statute Barred is simply nonsense.
You may be asked to make a statement, but you probably won't. All that TS might do, would be to send the buggers a letter reminding them of the OFT Guidance Notes and suggesting that they might prefer to behave themselves lest the OFT gets on their case.
You won't have to take the buggers to court.
Originally posted by KEV30
View Post
You do not need to prove anything.
For them to claim that a payment made in July 2011 has somehow prevented the debt from becoming Statute Barred is simply nonsense.
and if i report them to trading standards what happens do i have to take them to court or something or will i just have to make a statement for trading standards to discipline them
You won't have to take the buggers to court.
Comment