Tweet
Re: OC solicitors striking out defence
No assignment was necessary as you had in effect admitted the debt
that is why you put the claimant to strict proof in your defence on their status to bring the claim in their own name on the assignment (YOU NEVER DID)
that was not done so the judge found that argument irrelevant as it was to late to bring in that argument as it was not mentioned in your defence under the law of property act 1925
lesson learned me thinks
stay away from that freeman garbage
No assignment was necessary as you had in effect admitted the debt
that is why you put the claimant to strict proof in your defence on their status to bring the claim in their own name on the assignment (YOU NEVER DID)
that was not done so the judge found that argument irrelevant as it was to late to bring in that argument as it was not mentioned in your defence under the law of property act 1925
lesson learned me thinks
stay away from that freeman garbage
Comment