Re: Help with RBS CC and Bryan Carter
It means that if no new regulated (modifying) Agreement was issued in relation to the amalgamated balance on more than one account, then attention should be drawn to CCA 1974; s 82 (2/3):
82. - (2) Where an agreement (a "modifying agreement") varies or supplements and earlier agreement, the modifying agreement shall for the ourposes of this Act be treayed as -
a) revoking the earlier agreement and
b) containing provisions reproducing the combined effect of the two agreements, and obligations outstanding in relation to the earlier agreement shall accordingly be treated as outstanding instead in relation to the modifying agreement.
(3) Of the earlier agreement is a regulated agreement but (apart from this subsection) the modifying agreement is for running account credit, it shall be treated as a regulated agreement.
Sounds like a load of blurb.... but basically, if accounts have been amalgamated and then assigned, then the assignor/assignee should be put to proof re. having your authority to do that.
I had this situation with a DCA some years ago; three accounts had been amalgamated and sold.... yet the "balance" was held under one of these accounts only because the creditor had transferred all outstanding sums into one account and then flogged that one account.
Naughty.... :nono:
:-)
Originally posted by davids3511
View Post
82. - (2) Where an agreement (a "modifying agreement") varies or supplements and earlier agreement, the modifying agreement shall for the ourposes of this Act be treayed as -
a) revoking the earlier agreement and
b) containing provisions reproducing the combined effect of the two agreements, and obligations outstanding in relation to the earlier agreement shall accordingly be treated as outstanding instead in relation to the modifying agreement.
(3) Of the earlier agreement is a regulated agreement but (apart from this subsection) the modifying agreement is for running account credit, it shall be treated as a regulated agreement.
Sounds like a load of blurb.... but basically, if accounts have been amalgamated and then assigned, then the assignor/assignee should be put to proof re. having your authority to do that.
I had this situation with a DCA some years ago; three accounts had been amalgamated and sold.... yet the "balance" was held under one of these accounts only because the creditor had transferred all outstanding sums into one account and then flogged that one account.
Naughty.... :nono:
:-)



Comment