Tweet
I have been dealing with these clowns for a wee while now. When I say dealing I mean ignoring them.
They did once get through to my OH and asked if she was ******* which is the name in the electoral list but not the name she uses.
Anyway they asked for me and without bothering about the data protection act proceeded to advise her that I would have 'a collections agent' standing on my doorstep should I fail to contact them.
Im still waiting on the doorstepper.
I get daily phonecalls from GO which i happilly ignore.
The threatomatics still pollute the letterbox.
Todays one is a real corker.
Its laughingly entitled URGENT - POSSIBLE BAILIFF INSTRUCTION
Apparently the debt owed to Go Debt is still unpaid. That would be the ALLEGED debt that has not been legally assigned to them in accordance with the Law of Property Act 1925
They are going to obtain a CCJ against me How wonderful that they are so certain a court will grant one
Their preferred enforcement option is to instruct the Court Bailiff. I stand to be corrected but I thought it was up to the court to appoint a Bailiff to enforce judgement not the DCA. Even then I thought judgement had to be granted against me AND I had failed to pay the judgement according to the Courts Direction.
Apparently I have yet another 7 days to make an arrangement with them.
Watch this space
I have two tricks up my sleeve which will blow these muppets out of the water
They did once get through to my OH and asked if she was ******* which is the name in the electoral list but not the name she uses.
Anyway they asked for me and without bothering about the data protection act proceeded to advise her that I would have 'a collections agent' standing on my doorstep should I fail to contact them.
Im still waiting on the doorstepper.
I get daily phonecalls from GO which i happilly ignore.
The threatomatics still pollute the letterbox.
Todays one is a real corker.
Its laughingly entitled URGENT - POSSIBLE BAILIFF INSTRUCTION
Apparently the debt owed to Go Debt is still unpaid. That would be the ALLEGED debt that has not been legally assigned to them in accordance with the Law of Property Act 1925
They are going to obtain a CCJ against me How wonderful that they are so certain a court will grant one
Their preferred enforcement option is to instruct the Court Bailiff. I stand to be corrected but I thought it was up to the court to appoint a Bailiff to enforce judgement not the DCA. Even then I thought judgement had to be granted against me AND I had failed to pay the judgement according to the Courts Direction.
Apparently I have yet another 7 days to make an arrangement with them.
Watch this space
I have two tricks up my sleeve which will blow these muppets out of the water
Comment