Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

[MIKE770]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Yes sirree pt.....the next time you come to Chester be advised to stay within the confines of the Roman Walls............MBNA offices are outside the walls......... just across the River ..........they may have snipers lined up just a stones throw away

Sparkie

No problem there MBNA cannot see further than their nose!:rockon::cheer2::cheer2::cheer2::cheer2::first:

[enaid]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

Bout time these Judges woke up and finally accept the consumer can be right and that not all their money problems are brought on purely by their own stupidity.
Well done all concerned a magic result.

[Nibbler]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

So this is binding on lower courts?

[Sparkie1723]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

County but Judgment of the Designated Civil Judge for Chester HHJ Derek Halbert

Judgments in awaiting the nod to post

Pt My favourite Judge....as you know......and I mean that....... even though he did NOT do too well by me in my B/H case
Sparkie

[Nibbler]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

I believe it was county court, but due to the importance of the judgment, it was to be handed down in the high court, today as far as I know. Keeping an eye on Balli as I presume it will be published there, if it isn't posted up here/elsewhere first by PT/QS.

County but Judgment of the Designated Civil Judge for Chester HHJ Derek Halbert

Judgments in awaiting the nod to post

Ah. That explains it. Thanks.

[pt2537]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

So was this High Court or County Court in the end then?

County but Judgment of the Designated Civil Judge for Chester HHJ Derek Halbert

Judgments in awaiting the nod to post

[Amethyst]

Re: Section 75 & Misrep Court Judgment - Paul Tilley

I believe it was county court, but due to the importance of the judgment, it was to be handed down in the high court, today as far as I know. Keeping an eye on Balli as I presume it will be published there, if it isn't posted up here/elsewhere first by PT/QS.

[Sparkie1723]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Just skim read the summary. The credit card companies are going to utterly loath you for that judgement. Well done.

Yes sirree pt.....the next time you come to Chester be advised to stay within the confines of the Roman Walls............MBNA offices are outside the walls......... just across the River ..........they may have snipers lined up just a stones throw away

Sparkie

[Nibbler]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Indeed, it was a very interesting case.

MBNA fought tooth n nail to keep it out of the High Court.

They did get an order of indemnity costs too, so this in my view shows the Courts distaste of what was clearly poor conduct throughout the claim.

So was this High Court or County Court in the end then?

[Amethyst]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Moved these posts over to new thread, I think the judgment deserves it

Full story here. http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...card-companies

(could do with a slightly more relevant title though)

Funnily enough I had posted this this morning - would it be the same case ? http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...t=land+banking

[dogtired]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Subscribe

[EXC]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

To be honest I don't think the QS press release does you justice. As I understand it there were, in my view, more significant aspects to the case than the Limitation Act.

You're a star.

[pt2537]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Just skim read the summary. The credit card companies are going to utterly loath you for that judgement. Well done.

Wait til you read the Judgment. It will be posted here when I can.

[Nibbler]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Just skim read the summary. The credit card companies are going to utterly loath you for that judgement. Well done.

[pt2537]

Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

Oooooh! Interesting.

Indeed, it was a very interesting case.

MBNA fought tooth n nail to keep it out of the High Court.

They did get an order of indemnity costs too, so this in my view shows the Courts distaste of what was clearly poor conduct throughout the claim.