• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

WON !! Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court judgment 26/03/14

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

    The politicians weren't letting on about this fund but to access it you need to have a pro bono solicitor that is aware of it.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

      Cheers Rico, I'm gonna go out and hunt me down one of them pro-bono solicitors.:beagle:
      'I don't see why everyone depends on me. I'm not dependable. Even I don't
      depend on me, and I'm me.'

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

        Originally posted by Rico View Post
        The politicians weren't letting on about this fund but to access it you need to have a pro bono solicitor that is aware of it.
        Funny that, I got told the other day through a friend of a friend who works in a sols office that Legal Aid is still available although we a very much led to believe it is not. I know nothing more about this but think it's worth a bit o googling lol

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

          Brilliant News Rico....

          I read your Appeal Judgment through recently. What a stinker?! Our barrister was stunned by it and said it would be overturned 'with ease'.

          Good Luck and speak soon. x
          "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

          I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

          If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

          If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

            It had me scratching my head, I thought I must be reading it wrong, until I received an opinion on a totally unrelated manner.

            Logic and courts are often a country mile apart.
            'I don't see why everyone depends on me. I'm not dependable. Even I don't
            depend on me, and I'm me.'

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

              Originally posted by Magrew View Post
              It had me scratching my head, I thought I must be reading it wrong, until I received an opinion on a totally unrelated manner.

              Logic and courts are often a country mile apart.
              Agree Magrew..........Courts never use logic .....its TOO easy.

              Sparkie

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

                January 28th - 2014 according to Rico on Cag.

                M1

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

                  Is there any update on this?

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

                    Not yet been dealt with it seems, going thru hoops and challenges ?I believe?

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

                      what about kickstarter?

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

                        Originally posted by ncf355 View Post
                        Is there any update on this?

                        January, as far as i know, for the supreme court.

                        M1

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

                          Happy New Year Folks,

                          Written case attached for Jan 28th.

                          HFC being earmarked as criminals to boot.

                          Let's hope a few of them, including those that have tried to resign themselves out of trouble, will finally be jailed.

                          Cheers,

                          Richard.
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

                            Originally posted by Rico View Post
                            Happy New Year Folks,

                            Written case attached for Jan 28th.

                            HFC being earmarked as criminals to boot.

                            Let's hope a few of them, including those that have tried to resign themselves out of trouble, will finally be jailed.

                            Cheers,

                            Richard.
                            Goood Luck Richard

                            Ill be watching this one with interest.
                            I work for Roach Pittis Solicitors. I give my free time available to helping other on the forum and would be happy to try and assist informally where needed. Any posts I make on LegalBeagles are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as legal advice. Any advice I provide is without liability.

                            If you need to contact me please email me on Pt@roachpittis.co.uk .

                            I have been involved in leading consumer credit and data protection cases including Harrison v Link Financial Limited (High Court), Grace v Blackhorse (Court of Appeal) and also Kotecha v Phoenix Recoveries (Court of Appeal) along with a number of other reported cases and often blog about all things consumer law orientated.

                            You can also follow my blog on consumer credit here.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

                              Good Luck Richard!! This is such a significant case, fingers and toes crossed for you xx
                              "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

                              I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

                              If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

                              If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Richard Durkin supreme court help needed

                                In suspenders, good luck x

                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X