• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

WON !! Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court judgment 26/03/14

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Thoughts be with you tomorrow Richard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparkie1723
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Originally posted by ncf355 View Post
    Sure makes sense in our world too Sparks!
    You must be travelling pretty close and paralell with my twighlight zone ncf be carefull you don't stray over the line ...its a bit dodgy over here
    Sparkie

    Leave a comment:


  • ncf355
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Sure makes sense in our world too Sparks!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparkie1723
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    I consider myself to be a simple logical person…and the way I see it is …..even it is decided there were two contracts…………one would have to be a debtor -supplier agreement…..the other a creditor debtor agreement. When Richard returned the laptop to PC world and got his deposit back that agreement would have been terminated.


    That left the creditor-debtor agreement……however because HFC paid PC World which I imagine contained an element of undisclosed commission as well.


    Richard received no benefit from either agreement …….even if there were two agreements.


    What he got was He has suffered from the abuse and damage all this caused him …he had no money …no goods no benefit ……only hassle……. He owes no money because he never had any in the first place. It’s PC world that owes HFC the money back
    Or …Am I being stupid as usual?
    Normally my logic is only considered useful in the Twighlight Zone
    Sparkie

    Leave a comment:


  • Sparkie1723
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Originally posted by Lord_Alcohol View Post
    Good luck Richard! I've booked the day off and will be watching.
    Ditto.......only can't watch haven't got Sky
    Sparkie
    Last edited by Sparkie1723; 27th January 2014, 16:34:PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lord_Alcohol
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Good luck Richard! I've booked the day off and will be watching.

    Leave a comment:


  • ncf355
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Roll on tomorrow!

    Leave a comment:


  • Doc2527
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Many thanks Amethyst

    Leave a comment:


  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...nt-Paul-Tilley

    Link would have helped really, sorry xx

    Leave a comment:


  • Doc2527
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Amethyst

    What's it called?

    Doc

    Leave a comment:


  • Amethyst
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    PT's judgment and associated posts on misrep purchases and sec 75 has been put on its own thread xx

    Leave a comment:


  • ncf355
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Originally posted by EXC View Post
    Celestine & Tom Brennan are planning on attending the afternoon session.
    Thats good to hear, should be able to get a decent commentary tmw evening then

    Leave a comment:


  • ncf355
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Originally posted by Nibbler View Post
    Can't make up my mind which bank I'd prefer that to be..... There are too many who deserve the pain. :tinysmile_hmm_t2:
    ROFL!

    Yes, with you on that one

    Leave a comment:


  • EXC
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Originally posted by ncf355 View Post
    Is anyone else (as in other than the "main man") from LB attending?
    Celestine & Tom Brennan are planning on attending the afternoon session.

    Leave a comment:


  • ncf355
    replied
    Re: Richard Durkin v HFC / PC World supreme court hearing 28th January 2014

    Seriously temmpted to take the day off so I can watch the progress of this

    Hmm........

    Is anyone else (as in other than the "main man") from LB attending?

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X