Hi everyone,
I'm new here so be patient.
I took a company to court for delivering faulty goods twice, using small claims court asking for a refund. The case was dismissed and the judge in his discussion said the company has to provide me with good of a suitable quality and fit for purpose. I'm now about to complete my allocation quetionaire and I've heard you can't re-litigate. Whats the point of consumer rights and judges comments? Do I carry on or let it go...can't afford a solicitor and no one wants to know ie. consumer direct. Any advice would be great. Thank you
I'm new here so be patient.
I took a company to court for delivering faulty goods twice, using small claims court asking for a refund. The case was dismissed and the judge in his discussion said the company has to provide me with good of a suitable quality and fit for purpose. I'm now about to complete my allocation quetionaire and I've heard you can't re-litigate. Whats the point of consumer rights and judges comments? Do I carry on or let it go...can't afford a solicitor and no one wants to know ie. consumer direct. Any advice would be great. Thank you

hotos. Although consumer advice told me that the onus is on the retailer to provide evidence and not the consumer. Also after 2 faulty goods you are entiled to a refund. Hence the first small claims


Comment