Re: Brandon v Amex - date of appeal hearing + detail?
It might be about whether he had a chance of winning but it has been used by many creditors to advance their position. The judgement is clearly wrong. A valid default notice is required and they don't have one. He surely has at least a prospect of winning on this point. It has indeed been held in the court of appeal that you need one and that is/was binding on the lower court who issued the summary judgement.
M1
Originally posted by peterbard
View Post
M1
Comment