• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Lloyds defence

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lloyds defence

    Thought some people who are waiting for their defence or starting their claim may find it useful to see an example of the defence that Lloyds are using.

    Below is the defence they have used in my case (no doubt a few others on that day too) There is also a thread in this topic with the order from the Judge dealing with my claim, I will also post my POC at some point....

    Here is the defence:

    1 The defendant Lloyds TSB "THE BANK" is as bank whose registered off ice 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN It is admitted that the Claimant has been a customer of the Bank at all material times.
    2 By openeing an account with the Bank, the customer enters into a commercial arrangement with the Bank for the provision of banking services. At account opening a customer is provided with details of the Bank's charges, currently in a leaflet a guide to our banking charges. By using the account, the customer acknowledges that the charges are incorporated into the contract. For personal customers, a number of services are provided for free, notwithstanding that they are an expense to the Bank. Such services presently include, but are not limited to providing;
    cheques
    bank satements
    the facility to make payments by direct debit and standing order
    debit cards
    ATM's "cash machines"
    3. By maintaining the account in credit, or within any limit agreed with the bank the customer may avoid most if not all charges. If the customer fails to ensure that there are sufficient cleared funds in the account to cover payments, whether by cheque, debit card, standing order or direct debit, the customer makes a request for a payment to be made from the banks own funds. If the bank makes payment or returns the payment, it provides a service as specified in the leaflet, and makes a charge in accordance with the contract. On page 1 of the leaflet, the bank explains that ? there are normally no charges for everyday banking at Lloyds TSB when your account is in credit.
    When you use an agreed overdraft, there is no monthly fee and we only charge interest on the amount you are overdrawn each day. where you go overdrawn without an agreement or where you use special services, such as copy statements, we will make a charge. This guide explains how these charges qwork, and when they will apply.
    If you want to use a service that we haven't listed we'll tell you the cost of that service before you give us the go-ahead.
    4. There is no breach of contract; the charge cannot therefore be a penalty, consequently there is no requirement that the charge be a pre-estimate of the bank's loss.
    5 The customer is given advance warning of charges being impose; statements show the charges, if any, the customer has incurred during the course of a month, and which will appear as debits on the following months statement. Customer are warned by letter when they go overdrawn or over their agreed limit without arrangement with the bank,. If the customer fails to remedy the position, and payments such as standing orders and direct debits are refused then again the customer is warned by letter.
    6 The charges are fair and reasonable, and it is denied that they are unlawful.
    7. The customer is notified of the charges in plain intelligible language at the conclusion of the contract, and on each monthly statement. The charges are terms which relate to the price payable by the xcustomer for a service provided by the.




    So there it is, I have copied this word for word, typo for typo lol.....

    any thoughts on this? apart from its a load of rubbish ramblings trying to worm out of bank charges!

    xxx
    Last edited by cinders; 16th June 2007, 15:00:PM. Reason: typo of my own
    Neither a borrower nor a lender be;
    For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
    And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.

  • #2
    I got this off there solicitors and have beed sent this by the court and a questioner to be filled in for the court and another £100 payment by the 28 th june if I wish to pursue the claim againgst the Lloyds bank do you think they are going to make me go to court
    L377414

    Comment


    • #3
      I cannot say for sure, as it would seem that they are letting things to get to court on a few cases but in the vast majority they are settling before. If you think about it like this - how many thousands are claiming vs 2 people who have got into court... odds are in your favour I would say and I am sure many will agree with me!

      The questionaire you have received is part of the process and you will find help completing it here

      http://www.legal-beagles.co.uk/forum...ims-track.html

      I had to complete one when I took on natwest and that didn't get to court so its nothing unusual. You will have to pay to file unless your claim is under £1500 like mine is. If you want any help with it PM me as we both seem to be at the same stage.

      Good luck


      Ruthie x
      Neither a borrower nor a lender be;
      For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
      And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.

      Comment


      • #4
        thanks Ruthie
        I will file it and hope for the best
        good luck to you
        le77414 x

        Comment


        • #5
          Now please correct me if I am wrong but my understanding is Lloyds have never appeared in court, in the two cases mentioned below, the claimants appeared in court but Lloyds did not, it was pure luck on their part that the judge decided to hear the case in their absence and find in their favour.

          Apart from trying to get hold of the relevant version of the T&Cs to when you opened your account and avoiding certain courts (N1 definitely a better option the MCOL) I do not see that there's a huge difference, they continue to pay out.

          I think the Judge has possibly given them an improved defence that they, and their overpriced solicitors, couldn't think of for themselves, but it still doesn't make any difference - onwards and upwards.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by l377414 View Post
            I got this off there solicitors and have beed sent this by the court and a questioner to be filled in for the court and another £100 payment by the 28 th june if I wish to pursue the claim againgst the Lloyds bank do you think they are going to make me go to court
            L377414
            I know lloyds have never turned up in court Ian, but l377414 was asking if they would have to go to court. I was pointing out the importance of doing this and not bolting because of the AQ.... and no, no bank has ever turned up which speaks for itself....still, kevboy is an example to show just how very prepared you do have to be....

            xx
            Neither a borrower nor a lender be;
            For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
            And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.

            Comment


            • #7
              Yes, sorry Ruthie, didn't mean to make light of the situation, it's really important that people are fully prepared, even if the defence don't turn up, to appear in court and put across a strong case, but I think it's equally as important that people aren't put off by the declarations that Lloyds have "won" a case.

              Comment


              • #8
                like someone we know says lloyds didnt win, the claimant lost!....ahem.....

                I think l was more worried about going to court in person rather than the bank turning up....

                anyway...READ YOUR PM MRS!!!

                x
                Neither a borrower nor a lender be;
                For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
                And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.

                Comment

                View our Terms and Conditions

                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                Working...
                X