• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

    Brief summary.

    SAR made 22nd June 2009 (to reclaim bank, loan, plus credit card penalties). SAR fee banked at once.

    Waited 40+ days for the data to arrive, but nothing showed up.

    Delivered second letter/LBA to my local branch on 10th August giving 7 more days to provide the info requested.

    Still no data.

    Lodged a complaint with the ICO on 18th August.

    Later that same week (after complaining to the ICO), I received some of the data, but not all of it. I was able to calculate my current account charges from 2001-2009 (about £1,500 with 8% on top), but not for my credit card and loans. They only sent credit card statements from 2003 onwards and only two of them.

    They included a note saying that they'd forward the missing data from the loans department shortly.

    I sent another letter (7th September), pointing out exactly what was missing and what I wanted: credit card statements earlier than 2003 as well as data for my settled loans and my current, defaulted loan.

    The day after, I received more bumph concerning my settled loans, but not everything I expected. There were no T&Cs (I want to check on PPI status for each), nothing with my signature on and nothing at all relating to my current, defaulted loan.

    I waited a few days for them to respond to my letter (I probably didn't wait long enough) and then delivered a N1 to my county court on 17th September, with a breakdown of costs/damages totalling about £170.

    I say I didn't wait long enough, because the day after I filed the N1, I received a reply from Lloyds saying that they've sent everything they can but will send on an I&E form (they never did and I asked three times). They say they've provided all credit card statements and that "in accordance with out retention policies, statements dating back to 1998 are no longer held."

    Back to 1998? They sent two from mid-2003 and on the earliest one it said I needed to contact them urgently about arrears, so I'd obviously like to see the statements that came before it. (I specifically said that I wanted EVERY credit card statement from when my account was opened in 1998. Are they really that thick or just pretending to be so that I don't see these penalty charges?)

    They said the same about loan agreements: no longer held due to retention policies (my loans were taken out in 1999 and 2000).

    I didn't bother writing back.

    Received their defence on 17th October. They challenge everything. They say they've complied with SAR, that my "losses are inadequately particularised" and "not caused by any actionable wrongdoing on the part of the bank" and requests that the claim be "struck out" and that I pay their costs.

    Yesterday the Allocation Questionnaire (Small Claims Track) arrived with an offer of a free mediation service.

    What would you do? Any advice gratefully received, as I'm really nervous about having to go to court and especially about having to pay their costs if I lose.

    I'm not convinced that I've got all the info they could have sent and believe I'm still entitled to request the costs I incurred in trying to make them comply. One letter and cheque for £10 should be all that it takes after all. But if the judge believes them when they say that they've sent all they can because the rest is no longer held, surely they can do no more in his eyes and I look unreasonable. I read that the claim could be heard outside the small claims track if they can prove that my conduct has been unreasonable and then they can push me for costs.

    I can't afford to go to court if this is the case.

    Please tell me what you would do in this situation.

    Thanks,
    FM

  • #2
    Re: FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

    Bump.

    I'm hoping that someone will comment on the missing data, agree that they haven't complied fully with my SAR, and urge me not to drop my court claim.

    I don't want to lose and pay their costs.

    Thanks,
    FM

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

      Hiya FM

      Have you sent them a nudge letter?http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...e.html#post443

      If their response to your further enquiry is unsatisfactory then you can make a data protection complaint using the data protection complaint form.


      Regards

      Tuttsi

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

        If it proceeds to a court hearing I think its essential that you ask/apply for the Court to excercise its discretion to inspect the Bank's records (under I think its section 15(2) of the Act.
        In my opinion a decision cannot be properly reached unless the data in question is physically inspected.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

          Thank you Tuttsi and CYNthesys.

          I wrote to tell them exactly what was missing and what I wanted, but they just wrote back saying they'd provided all that they could. I didn't bother writing back after that.

          When I saw their defence, it sounded so confident and I've been wondering if I should drop the case now.

          Do you think it's wise for me to proceed to court? They seem sure that they've complied fully and paying the £35 hearing fee and getting nothing back would be bad enough, never mind having to pay their costs.

          Thanks,
          FM

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

            FM79

            Have they supplied you with any manually held info, or is it all electronic stuff

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

              Hi CYNthesys,

              It's mostly electronic and much of it makes no sense to me at all, but there are some photocopies of documents such as a credit card application and copies of letters I've sent in the past.

              Best,
              FM

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

                Have you asked them what their retention policy is?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: FM v Lloyds (and going to court over SAR non-compliance + costs)

                  No...

                  Comment

                  View our Terms and Conditions

                  LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                  If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                  If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                  Working...
                  X