• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Pam 1 v's Natwest

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pam 1 v's Natwest

    Well sort of v's
    i have just gone through my lads statements.
    £282 charges in 16 months.

    Not to worried about cliaming them yet, may sit on the test case.
    i warned him when i did a claim before.. Sort your financies out ..but mum doesn't know anything:rolleyes:

    Anyway to the point...
    When i read the statements the charges are taken and a date is printed in the discription section.

    I am assuming this date is in relation to the status of the account and charges activated.

    So if a charge creates a charge, is that normal.?

    All those lines for that little question lol,.
    Thanks
    P

    sorry added another, whats a referral charge?
    Last edited by pam1; 23rd August 2007, 15:59:PM.

  • #2
    Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

    The date in the description column is when the charges was taken. Is that what you mean?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

      That's £30 for not having enough money in your account to a DD or SO.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

        nope its similar to when a decit card payment comes in and it tells you the date of purchase.

        columns are
        1, date
        2, details, cash withdrawl, charge etc
        3, discription purchase or mobile top up etc, ( this has a date also with the charge when it is taken)
        4, withdrawn amounts.
        5, pain in
        6, balance



        just adding a bit more, i can tell the charges are taken on the last day of the following month, sadly each charge generated an overdraft charge again. :-(
        Last edited by pam1; 23rd August 2007, 16:09:PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

          they take you overdraft interest usually on the last day ot the month or the nearest working day. If that takes you over your limit they will charge you £28.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

            Nope :-( :-(
            they are all £28 last day of each month and all convieniently before a transaction and some seem to have been placed before a transaction made 2 days prior so it seems the charge did not make the account go over drawn, but surely if the money was spent 2 days prior then the funds were earmarked, meaning the charge came in after?

            I hate LLoyds but at least there statements were straight forward.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

              charges are straight forward cos I wrote the charges guide. The sticky in the natwest forum

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

                exceellent just opened it, very pro i must say

                Ok I,ve got one sorted, and collated phew..
                The referall fee was charged in May for the charge that took the account over its overdraft but it was OD by £9.69

                many of the OD charges are for £4 ish overdrawn,

                Nattie I need some guidance on this as my mum has a step account and a basic grey card, we were told she shouldnt incur charges. But it can be possible to get 2 purchases collide in a small amount of time if shopping. But as long as its minimal amounts she will be ok.

                we never want an Overdraft on the account but mum needs this card for security when she goes out alone.

                I have to get this set in stone one way or the other, as its mums Overdraft issue im trying to get straight with lloyds.
                Last edited by pam1; 23rd August 2007, 17:01:PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

                  Pam1- when you work for the enemy. I am the enemy by the way, work for the bank and am NatWestStaffMember on some sites(the guys on here shortened it to Nattie in a chat room many moons ago but still NWSM on MSE). Professional, nah, I work for them so I know how it works. If you need anymore help, then shout, and I can help.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

                    Only the question of a charge , generating another charge.
                    and the cashpoint worry for my mum thanks

                    Although I have found a charge that has one of those dates for a month and there is nothing wrong within the month??? but that can't be right ive never heard of someone getting a charge for nothing.

                    i will have a damn good rummage through tomorrow, may scan them in if it helps.

                    P

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

                      Could be a cheque clearing and the account going overdrawn, or charge causing the charge

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

                        I think that usually the overlimit charge of 28 is for the month before. I get a notice every month telling me what charges and interest are going to be debited, it says what period the charges are for and its usually for the previous month.
                        Is no longer here

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

                          Yeap wendy thats definatelyt how it works, im going to have to go in branch with this one there is no sign as to why the charge has been applied.

                          Natty no cheque books in this house, very limited interaction with banks allowed.

                          So charges can create charges, how awfull.
                          Oh well have to make a cliam when the test case is won.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

                            cheques being paid into your account not out of it.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Pam 1 v's Natwest

                              Oh sorry, nope nothing like that ,no cheques gone in this account, im sure wages are paid by BACS, never had a problem with wages.

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                              Working...
                              X