Tweet
If there is anyone who would be willing to have a call I will be truly grateful.. I have spoken to one Solicitor who has said their conduct is borderline Contempt... He. has told me that the court has failed and seems ike clear bias - he stated the Judge seems to adopt the defendants own reasoning whist not even considering the material content.. which is. err in law..
Loading...
-
-
So those things were not, as you had stated, in fact considered by the judge in reaching the conclusion that your application wanted merit.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560Comment
-
atticus – I appreciate the point, but that is precisely the core of the now appeal.
The documents ('Do Not List' Direction and the Head of Legal Email) were before the Judge as part of the N244 application and the evidence bundle.
In law, there is a fundamental distinction between a Judge 'considering' evidence and a Judge 'giving weight' to it. If a Judge has an express judicial stay in front of him and concludes that a breach of that stay is 'Totally Without Merit' to challenge, he has not 'applied' the law; he has reached a perverse finding of fact.
The 'irreconcilable gap' between the primary evidence (the Stay) and the Judge’s conclusion (TWM) is the 'Serious Procedural Irregularity' that the Court of Appeal is designed to correct. As a Litigant in Person, I rely on the principle in Wasif v SSHD [2016]: if there is a 'spark of merit'—which a documented breach of a court order surely is—a TWM certification is an error of law."
The judge ignored evidence and cherry picked the evidence, which to even to the common person shows red flags..Comment
-
You may be right. You have rightly been careful with the information you have given, which makes it difficult to comment.
Good luck with your appeal.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560Comment
-
Is there a possibility anyone on this forum can take a look and help ?
Or refer me to a link where i can get some much needed help?Comment
-
Take a look at Paul Tilleys profile inc email - https://legalbeagles.info/forums/member/551-pt2537Originally posted by qaz786 View Post
He has good expertise in this area but cannot always post on the forum as he's a busy man, but a very smart one in this field of law."Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012
)
I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007
If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page
If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. comComment
-
None of which gives us any understanding of the underlying facts and legal basis of the case.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560Comment
-
atticus Did you read my replies above ? in partiular the one at 20th January 2026, 17:01:PM,
Please do remember I am not legally trained, but i do know only the judge can vary an existing order, and a paper application under 23.8 can only be listed if a judge provides an order to do so... Court staff or parties cannot overide a judges pre-existing direction.
Comment
-
I have read the entire thread and am none the wiser as to what the underlying factual and legal basis of the case might be.
Another poster has mentioned a vacuum of information.
Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560Comment
-
@Atticus,
To clarify the 'vacuum' of information—the underlying claim is for Banking Negligence.
The Substantive Facts: They failed to trigger any safeguards and allowed the total dissipation of investor funds.
Why the 'Nullity' is the priority: The Bank knows I have no money to fight the main claim. They are using the 12th December hearing—which was held in breach of a judicial stay—to obtain a £12,000 costs order. They are now using that order to try and strike out my main claim or bankrupt me before the 'negligence' ever gets to a trial.
I am not just 'arguing a technicality.' I am seeking a declaration of nullity because:- Under Craig v Kanssen, an order made without jurisdiction (in breach of a stay) is a nullity and must be set aside as of right.
- If that order stands, it stifles my ability to bring the main negligence claim.
I am asking for confirmation on the nullity because it is the 'domino' and protects my claim, or allows the bank to bury the negligence forever.
Comment
Comment