Any advice on this will be much appreciated.
I bought an apartment via a Property Investment Company Bueno Investments in 2006. The deal was £5000 and I would become owner of the tenanted property. I will say up front Bueno vanished, the lawyer was struck off that dealt with the sale and I was never contacted, also the mortgage packaging company was also closed due to malpractcie
The Lender was the Mortgage Business (TMB) the Surveyor Colleys. I had never and have never since ventured into Buy to Let. Colleys came back with a valuation of £79 995. TMB loaned on property with a 2 year introductory rate which at conclusion will be moved to their SVR of 1.99% above BoE until end of the term (25 years). I was moved to a different product with no signed agreement and this product was amended with a move to an HVR. The HVR product was 4.95% above the BoE. I never signed anything to reflect this rate.
Ombudsmen have told me to seek legal representation as they see no problem with this but surely if I did not sign an agreement of 4.95% above BoE then how can they enforce it? Ombudsman also have also said how the TMB derived the rate is 'commercially sensitive'.
The property was overvalued by Colleys by almost 100%. All those properties to June 2006 had never sold above £41K. November 2006 all were Surveyed and sold using Colleys and TMB sale prices (14 apartments) were £79 995. I had the property valued by local agents in 2011, 2015 and all came back with £35-40K. TMB were fully aware to this negative equity, unable to move lender so they increased their interest rate to 4.95%. Effectively forcing me to pay over double the signed agreement of 1.99% above BoE.
If there was no signed agreement have they operated against the law?
I bought an apartment via a Property Investment Company Bueno Investments in 2006. The deal was £5000 and I would become owner of the tenanted property. I will say up front Bueno vanished, the lawyer was struck off that dealt with the sale and I was never contacted, also the mortgage packaging company was also closed due to malpractcie
The Lender was the Mortgage Business (TMB) the Surveyor Colleys. I had never and have never since ventured into Buy to Let. Colleys came back with a valuation of £79 995. TMB loaned on property with a 2 year introductory rate which at conclusion will be moved to their SVR of 1.99% above BoE until end of the term (25 years). I was moved to a different product with no signed agreement and this product was amended with a move to an HVR. The HVR product was 4.95% above the BoE. I never signed anything to reflect this rate.
Ombudsmen have told me to seek legal representation as they see no problem with this but surely if I did not sign an agreement of 4.95% above BoE then how can they enforce it? Ombudsman also have also said how the TMB derived the rate is 'commercially sensitive'.
The property was overvalued by Colleys by almost 100%. All those properties to June 2006 had never sold above £41K. November 2006 all were Surveyed and sold using Colleys and TMB sale prices (14 apartments) were £79 995. I had the property valued by local agents in 2011, 2015 and all came back with £35-40K. TMB were fully aware to this negative equity, unable to move lender so they increased their interest rate to 4.95%. Effectively forcing me to pay over double the signed agreement of 1.99% above BoE.
If there was no signed agreement have they operated against the law?
Comment