Re: Fendyweather -v- Abbey - Round 2
Hey there Tuttsi,
The telephone conference was a piece of cake. A little daunting at the time I had the first one purely because it was unknown territory,, but really truly, its fine. Nothing to worry about at all. I found that because I was a litigant in person, the judge was very calm, cool, and made everything sound so easy. He had the patience of a saint because he obviously knew I was a total novice at this claiming thing. Just ensure you have pen and paper and everything to hand and make notes of everything hes saying. You might need to refer back to stuff later, but basically all it is for is to decide which track the claim is to be allocated to, and either way small claims or fast track youre home and dry. The one thing I did stipulate though was my desire that the defendants i.e. Natwest at the time, give a breakdown to court of exactly how each of their charges had been arrived at, they squirmed a bit when I said that but the judge upheld it and said he agreed, that they must do that.................... thats kind of when I knew I had it in the bag, even though they wanted to go for full disclosure, but on account of my claim was huge 16K they tried to stall as much as possible. Seriously you dont have to be einstein and you dont have to know much about the legal process, Im sure you will find the judge will be patient and kind and very informative because he knows you dont have legal representation. They tend to go really easy on us mere mortals of non legal brained ness. Lol Lol Lol xxxxxxxxxxxxxx piece of cake. Trust me, you have nothing to worry about, you dont need to sound like a professional, just a normal human being trying to find your way through the process.
ALL THE BEST. IT WILL BE GOOD EXPERIENCE BUT DO GO THROUGH WITH IT. THE BANKS TEND TO HOPE WE WONT SHOW FOR THESE CONFERENCES, BUT ENSURE YOU DO. DONT BACK DOWN NOW........... youve nothing to be afraid of. Truly. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fendy xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hey there Tuttsi,
The telephone conference was a piece of cake. A little daunting at the time I had the first one purely because it was unknown territory,, but really truly, its fine. Nothing to worry about at all. I found that because I was a litigant in person, the judge was very calm, cool, and made everything sound so easy. He had the patience of a saint because he obviously knew I was a total novice at this claiming thing. Just ensure you have pen and paper and everything to hand and make notes of everything hes saying. You might need to refer back to stuff later, but basically all it is for is to decide which track the claim is to be allocated to, and either way small claims or fast track youre home and dry. The one thing I did stipulate though was my desire that the defendants i.e. Natwest at the time, give a breakdown to court of exactly how each of their charges had been arrived at, they squirmed a bit when I said that but the judge upheld it and said he agreed, that they must do that.................... thats kind of when I knew I had it in the bag, even though they wanted to go for full disclosure, but on account of my claim was huge 16K they tried to stall as much as possible. Seriously you dont have to be einstein and you dont have to know much about the legal process, Im sure you will find the judge will be patient and kind and very informative because he knows you dont have legal representation. They tend to go really easy on us mere mortals of non legal brained ness. Lol Lol Lol xxxxxxxxxxxxxx piece of cake. Trust me, you have nothing to worry about, you dont need to sound like a professional, just a normal human being trying to find your way through the process.
ALL THE BEST. IT WILL BE GOOD EXPERIENCE BUT DO GO THROUGH WITH IT. THE BANKS TEND TO HOPE WE WONT SHOW FOR THESE CONFERENCES, BUT ENSURE YOU DO. DONT BACK DOWN NOW........... youve nothing to be afraid of. Truly. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fendy xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Comment