• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Statutory Demand from Lowell - WON!!!

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Statutory Demand from Lowell - WON!!!

    Hi Everyone.
    on the 7th of October I recieved a statory demand from Lowell for a loan held previously wiht Lloyds. I have asked on several occasion to product the letter of acknowledgement, agreement, statement and had nothing. the agreement was from March 2005.

    I have filled in the form to have the demand "set a side" and the witness statement. Now on the Statory demand it says "Any application by you to set aside this demand should be made to that court, which is "warrington CC. So today I went to serve my paper and was ask were I live. I told them merseyside, and thye have told me that I need to fil these in Merseyside. I had later called them, and I mentioned what it states in the later, but agin she informed me that it need to be in merseyside.
    Will this be correct.
    if so I can only finr Liverpool and birhenhad to file this.
    Hope someone can point me in the correct direction.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

    Hi Frosty

    It is very common for BW Legal to put the wrong court on the statutory demand.

    Would you like my help with this? If you read my signature, I set these demands aside professionally and I have been successful on every single Lowell stat demand I've acted on so far. No costs for you as the work is done No Win No Fee.

    If you want to continue as a Litigant in Person, we will help you every step of the way, but do be prepared for a day in court.

    You can email me on katebriscoe@howlettclarke.co.uk or telephone 01273 327272 to speak with me.

    Loads of luck

    :beagle2222:
    "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

    I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

    If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

    If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

      Is there some way - such as getting the buggers done for contempt - by which those gits can be persuaded to abandon their dirty tricks?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

        I'm actually not convinced its a deliberate 'trick'. The court system has been through a major reshuffle. Insolvency Courts are specialised and have been amalgamated into larger courts. Pretty much every case, I make a cursory check with the court to check they have correct jurisdiction. Approx 15% are incorrect. Most greater London County Courts feed their insolvency cases into the RCJ now, I just don't think BW 'have time' to check absolute jurisdiction on every case.

        A stat demand I took instruction on today only had 3 pages. 2 were completely missing including the critical one with the relevant court name listed! Now that was just caused by too much haste. I'm now acting on nearly 20 stat demands and they just keep coming. I'm imagining a bit of a production line maybe at BW Legal?
        "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

        I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

        If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

        If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

          Celestine should provide a pro forma letter that people can post to the LeedsLosers to advise them that if they wish to pursue their SD that she will be acting for the Defendant. A look at the success rate of them v Celestine should loosen their bowels sufficiently to withdraw their SD.

          Surely the time has come to take action against BW ilLegal

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

            I've invited several people to mention in response letters that I/PT have advised and that should they wish to commence legal action, we would be instructed.

            Seems to be working ok so far! :tinysmile_kiss_t4:
            "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

            I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

            If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

            If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

              Originally posted by celestine View Post
              A stat demand I took instruction on today only had 3 pages. 2 were completely missing including the critical one with the relevant court name listed! Now that was just caused by too much haste. I'm now acting on nearly 20 stat demands and they just keep coming. I'm imagining a bit of a production line maybe at BW Legal?
              Originally posted by ODC View Post
              Surely the time has come to take action against BW ilLegal
              One may be reminded of the celebrated antics of ACS:Law. (link)

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

                Originally posted by ODC View Post
                Celestine should provide a pro forma letter that people can post to the LeedsLosers to advise them that if they wish to pursue their SD that she will be acting for the Defendant. A look at the success rate of them v Celestine should loosen their bowels sufficiently to withdraw their SD.

                Surely the time has come to take action against BW ilLegal
                It does make me wonder whether BW ilLegal and other firms with similar MOs should be closed down in the public interest, if only to protect consumers.
                Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

                  Originally posted by bluebottle View Post
                  It does make me wonder whether BW ilLegal and other firms with similar MOs should be closed down in the public interest, if only to protect consumers.
                  ACS:Law was.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

                    In hand
                    "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

                    I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

                    If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

                    If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell

                      Won with full costs paid

                      :bounce::bounce::bounce:
                      "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

                      I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

                      If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

                      If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell - WON!!!




                        How many is that now? :beagle2222:

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell - WON!!!

                          54 I think

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell - WON!!!

                            64 as of today :beagle2222:
                            "Although scalar fields are Lorentz scalars, they may transform nontrivially under other symmetries, such as flavour or isospin. For example, the pion is invariant under the restricted Lorentz group, but is an isospin triplet (meaning it transforms like a three component vector under the SU(2) isospin symmetry). Furthermore, it picks up a negative phase under parity inversion, so it transforms nontrivially under the full Lorentz group; such particles are called pseudoscalar rather than scalar. Most mesons are pseudoscalar particles." (finally explained to a captivated Celestine by Professor Brian Cox on Wednesday 27th June 2012 )

                            I am proud to have co-founded LegalBeagles in 2007

                            If we have helped you we'd appreciate it if you can leave a review on our Trust Pilot page

                            If you wish to book an appointment with me to discuss your credit agreement, please email kate@legalbeaglesgroup. com

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Statutory Demand from Lowell - WON!!!

                              Originally posted by Celestine View Post
                              64 as of today
                              Amazing!
                              You don't look a day over 55. msl:

                              Comment

                              View our Terms and Conditions

                              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                              Working...
                              X