WON!!! Lowells and a statutory demand threat X 3!!!

[FlamingParrot]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

:tinysmile_aha_t: OMG !! They have done it again they have just had another process server serve me again with another SD for the same debt and reference number thats 3 now dohh..... :der: what are these morons playing at they have defo gone cookoo :der:

:scared: :scared: :scared: Sounds like there's something seriously wrong with their internal processes!

As some process servers charge a higher fee for the first visit and a reduced fee for subsequent visits, maybe the Lowlifes are getting a 3 for 2 offer given how much business they give the process servers of their choice!

But this shouldn't alter the fact that, if they can't produce an agreement by Friday, it's 3 strikes and they're out for the Leeds Losers!

[Celestine]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Yep, unbelievable. I've got the file handler calling me back in a few minutes to explain...... :boom:

This should be interesting!!!

[MIKE770]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Buy one get 3 free???

[PlanB]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Yep, unbelievable. I've got the file handler calling me back in a few minutes to explain...... :boom:

This should be interesting!!!

You may have offered her a discount on your fees for the second SD last time, but this time you should charge them double and go on doubling the costs until they stop being so silly.

Long may it last :tongue2:

[bmw2602]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

:biggrin1: Do you think i should nail my letterbox shut so i don't recieve any more ha ha !!

[Celestine]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Well I stand by my theory that the process server has actually fallen deeply in love with you and is fabricating these SD's to continue the chance to gaze into your beautiful eyes..........:tinysmile_kiss_t4:

BW Legal have proffered a grovelling apology to BMW and are doing an enquiry (probably just a head count of threat hamsters in office in reality).

[bmw2602]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

If i hadn't had kate sorting them out i would be going suicidal by now Thankyou Kate :noidea: Kate has now renamed them comedy SD's ha ha ! by now

[ODC]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Surely some compensation is due from BW Ilegal and The Leeds Losers

[bmw2602]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Well I stand by my theory that the process server has actually fallen deeply in love with you and is fabricating these SD's to continue the chance to gaze into your beautiful eyes..........:tinysmile_kiss_t4:

BW Legal have proffered a grovelling apology to BMW and are doing an enquiry (probably just a head count of threat hamsters in office in reality).

Ha Ha Ha im rolling about on the floor here laughing my head off thanks for that you made my day..
:gossip: Ha Ha guess what else, the process server who came to the door was wearing a bullet proof vest :laugh: mmmm i wonder what he thought we were goin to do to him....

[FlamingParrot]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Ha Ha Ha im rolling about on the floor here laughing my head off thanks for that you made my day..
:gossip: Ha Ha guess what else, the process server who came to the door was wearing a bullet proof vest :laugh: mmmm i wonder what he thought we were goin to do to him....

Maybe some people take "shoot the messenger" literally!

[bmw2602]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Lowell's - Bw legal - P & A Receivables got Monarch Private Investigations to serve the 3 SD's what's that all about I wonder :tinysmile_hmm_t2: Four idiots involved with serving an SD x 3.... mmm

[ODC]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Lowell's - Bw legal - P & A Receivables got Monarch Private Investigations to serve the 3 SD's what's that all about I wonder :tinysmile_hmm_t2: Four idiots involved with serving an SD x 3.... mmm

They are all acting on the instructions of Crimolowells who are responsible for the actions of the muppets the chose to employ

[FlamingParrot]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Lowell's - Bw legal - P & A Receivables got Monarch Private Investigations to serve the 3 SD's what's that all about I wonder :tinysmile_hmm_t2: Four idiots involved with serving an SD x 3.... mmm

How many muppets does it take to serve a SD (that will be set aside in a couple of days :thumb? In the case of Lowlifes, probably 16! :lol: :lol: :lol:
...and how much is it costing them, with soooo many intermediaries involved, it must be a bundle!

...and they won't be able to produce a CCA by Friday, will they? As there was never one to start with!

[CleverClogs]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

How many muppets does it take to serve a SD (that will be set aside in a couple of days :thumb? In the case of Lowlifes, probably 16! :lol: :lol: :lol:
...and how much is it costing them, with soooo many intermediaries involved, it must be a bundle!

Unless they're on a Workfare placement.

[mystery1]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

.and they won't be able to produce a CCA by Friday, will they? As there was never one to start with!

A s78 reply doesn't need a signature nor does it need to comply with the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983. Therefore i would say that, potentially, they could give a copy of the agreement that they believe was in force. Yes the duty is to provide an executed copy, executed agreement being "a document, signed by or on behalf of the parties, embodying the terms of a regulated agreement, or such of them as have been reduced to writing." however would a creditor ever admit in court that a document that requires signing was in fact never signed ?

If that arose then there would be different arguments and evidence presented that nothing was signed.

M1