WON!!! Lowells and a statutory demand threat X 3!!!

[FlamingParrot]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

:tinysmile_aha_t: OMG !! they have done it again the lowlifes of leeds they have just had a server push through my door another SD from who or what i do not know the weird thing is its the same reference number on the previous letter the server left me from bw legal/lowells... OMG what do i do now

:scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared:

What's the date on it and what does it say? Is it possible it's just a copy of the previous one and someone at Lowlife HQ got their cables crossed? :noidea:

Could you remove personal details and post it up?

Hi everyone,

Just a wee update on our sd from lowells, the application to set aside have now been filed at the court, a huge thanks to kate.. now its wait time hope its a good outcome, will update when i hear anything thankyou to everyone on Lb for your help you have been brilliant... ray:

[bmw2602]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Hi thanks for your reply, i have attached both letters from the server as you can see they are both the same ref No but different dates... :tinysmile_hmm_t2:

[bmw2602]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

not sure how to attach a picture tried always, not sure if i have done it right :tinysmile_aha_t:

[Celestine]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Well, the same BW Legal ref No:XXXX gives the game away somewhat.

[PlanB]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Well, the same BW Legal ref No:SXXXX gives the game away somewhat.

Don't tell me this SD is for the same debt :twitch:

The process server's company has a mission statement which goes: " P & A's mission is to provide service with integrity". Ummm maybe not.

[FlamingParrot]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Looking at the attachment, the SD is due to be served on May 3rd, looks like the Lowlifes don't know what they are doing, both letters are dated the 26th of the month, maybe they have a system whereby accounts get flagged up on a certain date and an instruction to serve a SD is automatically generated. :noidea:

[ODC]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

What a wunch of bankers

[bmw2602]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Thanks everyone for making me laugh, i thought it was a tad odd with the same reference number, what are they playing at i wonder ? :crazy:

[Celestine]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Playing at 'law' from where I'm sitting :attention:

[bmw2602]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

:yawn: Hi everyone, just a wee update on the second sd i recieved, yep its the same one again, i have no idea why they have served the same one exactly the same date a month later :confused2: mmm its true what FlamingParrot said on thread 36. i think they gone cuckoo !! :crazy:

[CleverClogs]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Playing at 'law' from where I'm sitting :attention:

One might have supposed they were playing at Silly Buggers but, for Lowells, that amounts to the same thing.

[Celestine]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

In reality, the lovely `xxxx` at BW Legal whose name was on your first SD has come to her senses and left this company. So presumably, she didn't do a great job on her 'close down' procedures and bingo....you get another demand.

[Celestine]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Update:

I wrote to BW Legal last week asking for an explanation for this second carbon copy SD.

"

I write to both of you regarding this case as I understand XX XX has

now left the company? Could you please advise me who is now handling this

file?

As you will see from the email below, I contacted BW Legal on the 19th April

2013 to notify our instruction in this matter.

We are advised that your firm has corresponded directly with our client by

issuing a further statutory demand regarding the same debt that we are

already instructed to defend.

We refer to the SRA Handbook Chapter 11 IB11.4 which clearly requires you to

liase with us and not our client. We are unaware of any exceptional

circumstances and would ask from here onwards that all communications are

directed to this firm and not our client.

Please also advise why this demand has been issued, as our client has

already made an application to set the first demand aside and now is faced

with added costs of preparing a second application."


And I got absolutely no response at all..... :o
So tomorrow I am filing a second set aside application for the SAME debt!!?

TWO sets of costs to pay for one debt? Lowell/BW are really utterly lost.:tung:

[ODC]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

They will probably try to blame 'xxxx'.

[Celestine]

Re: Lowells and a statutory demand threat

Probably....let's hope she's moved onto a better career?!

But my email last week did give them fair warning.......