• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Statutory demand from Lowell

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lbmarcos
    started a topic Statutory demand from Lowell

    Statutory demand from Lowell

    Hi all,
    First post here. My wife used to use these site when looking to reclaim bank charges and she told me to post a message to see if anyone could me out.

    Basically, I've returned from wowrk this morning and an agent has posted through my door a Statutory Demand threatening bankruptcy proceedings. The letter is from Hamptons Legal and the Statutory demand is served by Lowell Portfolio Limited. It relates to a credit card debt that it seems Lowell purchased from Barclaycard in July last year.

    Am I able to do anything and are Lowell within their rights to bankrupt me?
    Any advices or guidance would be so appreciated and I do not think I could handle the worry and stress of bankruptcy proceedings and I guess losing our house.
    Many thanks.
    Tags: None

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Originally posted by Crispybacon View Post
    What Lowells went to court with was a disgrace and they should have been held in contempt. As has already been said they were chancing it, hoping that you would be intimidated and not turn up to defend and get a default judgement which happens far too often.
    Exactly.

    I do wonder, if 100% of people actually attended their hearings to defend, what the % success rate would be compared to judgements given now if that is the scant evidence that is produced.
    I believe the OFT should be made aware of such antics, as issuing a Statutory Demand which has no realistic chance of success must surely contravene many (if not all) of their guidelines.

    I only hope that their costs in foolishly pursuing this matter exceed the judgement they were seeking in the first place.
    The fines the OFT could impose (but won't) would certainly exceed their costs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Originally posted by lbmarcos View Post
    The judge was not very impressed with what Lowells had sent and asked me if I had knowledge of the debt and if so was I disputing it. I advised that I was unaware of this debt as I thought I had paid off all my credit cards when we moved house some 6 years ago. The Judge took the view that there was a very high chance that the debt was Statute Barred and although he said that if Lowells did come up with additional info they could still issue me with bankruptcy proceedings he dismissed the Statutory Demand.
    Did he also award costs?

    Good news but will have to see if Lowells come back with any further in the future or whether they just sell it on to someone else or give it back to Barclaycard.
    They'll probably sell it to Statute Barred specialist such as those geniuses at MacKenzie Hall,

    Leave a comment:


  • Crispybacon
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Just also wanted to add well done for standing your ground and attending the hearing.

    What Lowells went to court with was a disgrace and they should have been held in contempt. As has already been said they were chancing it, hoping that you would be intimidated and not turn up to defend and get a default judgement which happens far too often.

    I do wonder, if 100% of people actually attended their hearings to defend, what the % success rate would be compared to judgements given now if that is the scant evidence that is produced.

    I only hope that their costs in foolishly pursuing this matter exceed the judgement they were seeking in the first place.

    Best
    Crispy

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Well done for standing your ground.

    You don't always get good judges, but thank goodness you did and Lowell's were absolutely useless.

    Leave a comment:


  • Amy
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Nice, well done x

    Leave a comment:


  • ODC
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Excellent News.. Now report their sorry asses.

    They were winging it. They knew they had diddly squat and were hoping to intimidate you or hoping that you wouldnt appear and they would get judgement by default.

    Now you know why they are known as THE LEEDS LOSERS

    Leave a comment:


  • lbmarcos
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Hi all,

    Just to confirm the outcome of my Court case last Thursday.

    The Statutory Demand Lowell were seeking was dismissed by the Judge.

    He looked at the only info that Lowells rep had with her which was 3 computer screenshots from Barclaycard which were barely illegible and had v.little info on them which the Lowell rep agreed with and from the start seemed embarassed as to what she and I had received.

    The judge was not very impressed with what Lowells had sent and asked me if I had knowledge of the debt and if so was I disputing it. I advised that I was unaware of this debt as I thought I had paid off all my credit cards when we moved house some 6 years ago. The Judge took the view that there was a very high chance that the debt was Statute Barred and although he said that if Lowells did come up with additional info they could still issue me with bankruptcy proceedings he dismissed the Statutory Demand.

    Good news but will have to see if Lowells come back with any further in the future or whether they just sell it on to someone else or give it back to Barclaycard.

    Marcos

    Leave a comment:


  • ODC
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    No result yet ????

    Leave a comment:


  • ODC
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Good Luck for tomorrow. Remember they arent called THE LEEDS LOSERS for nothing:beagle:

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    yeah thats the one.

    ps that's bob diamond's mug shot innit?

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Originally posted by The Debt Star View Post
    and draw the DCAs a picture of your complaint instead
    Like this?

    Leave a comment:


  • lbmarcos
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    OK guys - getting nervous as it's my day in Court tomorrow!

    No new developments and still only have the scant info that I've received previously. Anyone any advices on how things will go - how should I address the judge and is it recommend that I wear suit and tie!

    Will draw up a timeline of events for the judge to read and take all papaerwork I've received so far - am just hoping I won't have to show a very detailed and complex knowledge of the CCA and that my argument that Hamptons have only sent me a few bits will get the case thrown out.

    Whats the best that I can hope for? The the SD will be 'kicked out' and that Hamptons / Lowell cannot chase me further for the alleged monies owed? What will then happen - I know the debt won't go away so am I to expect Lowell to sell it on to another DCA or will they give it back to Barclaycard? If they do is the debt still unenforceable until Barclaycard can supply me with a signed agreement, etc?

    Thx, marcos

    Leave a comment:


  • talktalk
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    If there is any potential for a civil court case and the dispute is major, then normally a judge will set aside.

    Leave a comment:


  • talktalk
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    They are in default of your request for a copy of your agreement, they have not supplied any statements for the duration of the account, and it is well known that some debts are made up entirely of excessive charges, no default notice in the prescribed form, no deed of assignment to prove that is has been assigned under UK law (some DCA's assign them offshore - which are not enforceable under UK law)

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X