• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Statutory demand from Lowell

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Curlyben
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Yet more Bovine Excrement from Wescott there.
    It is THEIR duty to respond to your request, as per CCA s175

    175. Where under this Act a person is deemed to receive a notice or payment as agent
    of the creditor or owner under a regulated agreement, he shall be deemed to be under a
    contractual duty to the creditor or owner to transmit the notice, or remit the payment,
    to him forthwith.
    No matter, when they next send you a demand then you can remind them of that fact..

    Leave a comment:


  • lbmarcos
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Thx CB,

    Yep dates have been put in the diary with a view to knowing how important it is that future Court cases should be attended.

    Any thoughts on Wescot telling me that should I require the CCA, etc for the debt they are chasing then I need to write to the original debtor???

    thx

    Leave a comment:


  • Curlyben
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    All good then.

    Keep an eye on the dates

    Leave a comment:


  • lbmarcos
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Quick update !

    Have spoken to the Court and they have confirmed that it is Lowell (the respondent) who should file and serve their statement by 25 April. Nothing received from Lowell so far.

    Will wait to see if I do get anything from them and respond accordingly.

    In the meantime I sent a CCA request to another DCA - Wescot - who have advised that if I require a copy of the opening agreement I need to put this in writing to the original creditor, namely Lloyds.

    Is this correct as I thought that it was Wescot who are now the new owners of the debt to supply the info I requested from them?

    Thx,

    Leave a comment:


  • Curlyben
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Give the court a call and ask them to clarify what the order is requesting.

    Well looks like Lowell have made a mess of yet another SD.

    So TP's so far

    1. Wrong account number
    2. No assignment from OC
    3. No agreement

    Can you think of anything else ?

    Leave a comment:


  • lbmarcos
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Thanks guys for the re-assurance.

    You're correct CB I've had absolutely nothing back from Lowells regards my request for a copy of the agreement of the notice of assignment.

    Do you know when I respond to the Court whether a particular court form needs completing or whether just a letter will suffice?

    And I WILL attend any future court hearings even if I do have to take a sickie to face the 'agent'

    Thx

    Leave a comment:


  • Curlyben
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Originally posted by Nibbler View Post
    Soliticor's agent.
    AKA Tea Boy

    Leave a comment:


  • Nibbler
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Soliticor's "agent".

    i.e. man carrying a bit of paper headed Hamptons Legal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Curlyben
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    I doub't it was a solicitor, but simply a paid lacky

    You only need worry if you shove your head in the sand.

    FIGHT and attend court and you WILL prevail.

    Can I assume that Lowells have still not responded to your request for information ??

    Leave a comment:


  • lbmarcos
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Thx CB - I know lesson learn't I guess but the only way I could have attended would have been to take a sickie which I hate doing.

    Will certainly attend any future hearings though.

    Are you surprised that Lowell sent a Solicitor or is this usual? Should I really start to worry about this actually turning into Bankruptcy as already this is worrying me

    Thx

    Leave a comment:


  • Curlyben
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    This is one of the main reasons why you should ALWAYS attend court hearings.
    If you where there this could of been dealt with then, but it's just going to drag on a bit longer.

    So time to list all of Lowells failings in this.

    Leave a comment:


  • lbmarcos
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Hi all,

    OK looks as though just my luck that Lowell are getting serious.

    My case was heard on Monday although I could not attend. Today I receive a letter from the court stating that

    "Upon hearing the Solicitors agent for Lowell Portfolio

    And upon reading the evidence (which I assume is what I sent to the Court as detailed in previous posts)

    1. Respondent shall file and serve their statement by 25 April
    2. The Applicant has permission if so advised to file and serve a statement in reply by 9 May.
    3. The case to be relisted on 2 June at XXX at XXX court.
    4. No order as to the costs of today.

    Sooooo, firstly I'm really surprised that they sent someone along. Secondly to confirm that despite my request to CCA request to Lowell requesting copy of agreement, deed of assignment, etc: I have not had anything back from them whatsoever.

    Any advises as to how I go from here - have to admit to being v.nervous but at the end of the day if they want to make me bankrupt so be it. I have no equity in my property and nothing I can give them.

    Thanks as ever,

    marcos

    Leave a comment:


  • ODC
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Another thing you should do is ring the person mentioned on the SD. Doubtless the threat monkeys will demand to know why and probably refuse to put you through. This would be more ammunition against the Leeds Losers. Take a note of the dates and times you attempt to contacft them

    Leave a comment:


  • Curlyben
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    I would also add:

    I have received no notice of the assignment from B'card concerning this account in accordance with s136 of law of Property Act and served in compliance with s196 of the same act.

    Also remove this
    Should Lowell Portfolio be in a position to supply me with the above information and prove there is a debt owed to them by myself I will happily discuss the repayment of any monies owed as a matter of urgency."

    Could change it to

    Should Lowell Portfolio be in a position to supply me with the above information and prove there is a debt owed to them by myself I will happily discuss this matter.

    So overall I would throw this in:


    I have no knowledge of the referenced account as stated nor that the debt is payable to Lowell Portfolio. I have requested from them evidence that the debt is owed to them by requesting a true copy of the credit agreement which under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act s78(1) they have 12 days to supply from the date of my request.

    Also, as I understand that Lowell Portfolio are a Debt Collection Agency I have requested a true copy of the executed deed of assignment for the agreement they quote (and whose reference number I have no knowledge of).

    I have received no notice of the assignment from B'card concerning any account in accordance with s136 of law of Property Act and served in compliance with s196 of the same act.

    I am minded to mention also that Lowell Portfolio have recent numerous warnings from Leeds Trading Standards as to their conduct in issuing Statutory Demands that they are using as a threat to bankruptcy when they have no intention to follow through the process and actually serve bankruptcy proceedings upon a debtor.

    Should Lowell Portfolio be in a position to supply me with the above information and prove there is a debt owed to them by myself I will happily discuss this matter.
    I think that should do it.
    So you are telling the court that the assignment is for toffee as B''card , NOT Lowell needs to send the NoA as well as the account number being unknown, and there not being a credit agreement.

    Leave a comment:


  • lbmarcos
    replied
    Re: Statutory demand from Lowell

    Hi all,

    Is anyone able to have a quick look at mt application to Set Aside just to see if they think it's good to go? I think with time against me it would be better if I could hand deliver this today.

    Many thanks

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X