Cambs Court fine and Marstons

[bizzybob]

Re: Cambs Court fine and Marstons

Certain mental health issues would possibly lead to license revocation so people should be very careful with these forms.

[bluebottle]

Re: Cambs Court fine and Marstons

It is becoming evident that not all mental health issues are purely psychological in nature. Indeed, what may appear to be "mental health issues" are, in fact, symptoms of a physical illness. For example, it has been found that, in elderly people, what appears, outwardly, to be symptoms of either dementia or psychosis are found, on investigation, to be a urinary tract infection (UTI) and the toxins being produced by the bugs that cause UTI are affecting the chemical balance in the brain, causing hallucinations, paranoia, delusion, etc..

What Milo, Wombats and BB say is very relevant and defendants do need to regard any advice to complete MALG forms with caution unless they have a confirmed diagnosis of psychiatric illness.

[bizzybob]

Re: Cambs Court fine and Marstons

I wonder how many cases of pre senile dementia are actually Statin induced memory loss?

[Wombats]

Re: Cambs Court fine and Marstons

We're drifting off subject, but this is related to the previous two posts:

http://mentalhealthtruths.com/six-co...ion-but-arent/

I still find it disturbing people are being told to get MALG forms when they are only for severe mental health issues. Vulnerability covers much more than mental health.

It's also worth mentioning here that vulnerability does NOT equal the debt being returned to the council.

The debtor must supply proof of vulnerability. The EA must inform the council of the debtor's vulnerability, and should treat the debtor sensitively, being aware of the vulnerability and its potential impact on the issue at all times.

The council would only take the debt back in the worst cases of vulnerability, the rest would remain with the enforcement company.

It seems there is an incorrect assumption that evidence of vulnerability means the debt will automatically be returned to the relevant authority - this is not the case.