• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Bailiff from Newlyn took the car which belongs to the company because my name on V5

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Bailiff from Newlyn took the car which belongs to the company because my name on

    Subject to confirmation by the OP, I think you will find the injunction was sought against the local authority that employed Newlyns, not Newlyn themselves. The creditor is, at all times, completely and totally liable for the actions of their enforcement agent. Notwithstanding that Newlyns are known for being economical with the actualities.
    Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Bailiff from Newlyn took the car which belongs to the company because my name on

      Obviously.

      Not sure what difference that makes to anything though?

      Whilst the council are responsible for the actions of its bailiffs, it is those actions that need to be questioned & challenged. It will be the bailiffs who argue that they "reasonably believed the car belonged to the debtor"

      This is despite the fact that he appears to have had sight of an invoice made out to a Ltd company. The bailiff has claimed he was taking the car as the debtors name was on the V5. The quote I supplied from a Judge would suggest that this is not good reason to do so. Given the other evidence and of course other options available to the bailiff, towing the car does not appear to be the most sensible corse of action.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Bailiff from Newlyn took the car which belongs to the company because my name on

        Commonsense, at the very least, should tell a bailiff that when faced with proof that a vehicle belongs to someone other than the debtor named on an order or warrant - even if it is a body corporate - you don't seize it and then try to force the non-debtor to pay someone else's debt or deprive them of their possessions without the authority of a court.

        Section 135, County Courts Act 1984 makes it quite clear that it is an absolute no-no to mislead a person into believing you are acting under the authority of a court. And it carries criminal sanctions.
        Life is a journey on which we all travel, sometimes together, but never alone.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Bailiff from Newlyn took the car which belongs to the company because my name on

          Do we know what happened yet or can we assume as it is quiet things didn't go to plan?

          Comment

          View our Terms and Conditions

          LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

          If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


          If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
          Working...
          X