Loading...
-
Tags: None -
Re: Geenty v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [1998] EWCA Civ 10 (13 Januar
Hes on my list, he was also at humberside,under investigation when he retired.Crown Copyright ©- LORD JUSTICE HIRST: This is an appeal against a decision of May J. (as he then was) on 11th January 1996, whereby he held that the words complained of in this defamation action were not capable of bearing one of the two meanings pleaded by the plaintiff in his statement of claim. The capability of the other meaning, which was also under attack by the defendants, was upheld by the judge.
The plaintiff, Mr. Patrick Paul Geenty, is an inspector who was at all material times stationed at Gloucester police station.
director at Police Crime Prevention Initiatives Limited.crazy council ( as in local council,NELC ) as a member of the public, i don't get mad, i get even - LORD JUSTICE HIRST: This is an appeal against a decision of May J. (as he then was) on 11th January 1996, whereby he held that the words complained of in this defamation action were not capable of bearing one of the two meanings pleaded by the plaintiff in his statement of claim. The capability of the other meaning, which was also under attack by the defendants, was upheld by the judge.
Tweet
Geenty v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [1998] EWCA Civ 10 (13 January 19
Comment