Loading...
-
Tags: None -
Re: Prince Aziz v Harb [2015] EWCA Civ 481 (13 May 2015)
Haha, a prince trying to use head of state immunity legislation to go back on a private oral contract, thinking such immunity would allow him to break any contract he or any head of state or a deceased head of state estate would be protected. They are no more above the law than the rest of us.Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (LB),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.
By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.
If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.
I AM SO GOING TO GET BANNED BY CEL FOR POSTING terrible humour POSTS.
The Governess; 6th March 2012 GRRRRRR
Tweet
Prince Aziz v Harb [2015] EWCA Civ 481 (13 May 2015)
Comment