Hi Beagles,
My company is making me redundant and I strongly suspect it is because I put in an informal grievance against my director. I basically wrote his managing style is upsetting a lot of people and making tasks a lot longer than needed. I had a meeting with the other director and she completely disagreed and said if I don't like it here I can leave and let her know by the end of the week. I promptly said "I was a bit hasty and wanted to stay here", purely to keep my job.
A week later I’m told I may possibly be made redundant as they no longer need design work (it’s a small part of my job). It’s a small company and I actually do many things, some of which no one else can do and the others they can’t do well (I have an ICT, marketing and design background and they are passing most of my work onto the assistant accountant). The redundancy is to cut costs apparently. Since the grievance the directors have hardly spoke to me and I suspect even though they went through procedures for me to suggest other work they had no plan in doing so.
To me what makes it double suspicious is that I requested flexible working hours for Friday afternoons and they declined on the basis I was too highly needed and could not be replaced in these times. Over the last 2 months they have increased pressure onto me to train other members of the team so that I am not the only one who knows things in the office as a kind of back up. Although now I suspect it was not for backup at all whilst I am here.
I have been offered minimum redundancy and asked to work my work notice.
My question is do you think I could have reasonable grounds for an unfair dismissal claim or strong argument for a higher redundancy package based on that I could have been unfairly dismissed?
Thank you for your help
- - - Updated - - -
I am a new user so can't answer PM messages
My company is making me redundant and I strongly suspect it is because I put in an informal grievance against my director. I basically wrote his managing style is upsetting a lot of people and making tasks a lot longer than needed. I had a meeting with the other director and she completely disagreed and said if I don't like it here I can leave and let her know by the end of the week. I promptly said "I was a bit hasty and wanted to stay here", purely to keep my job.
A week later I’m told I may possibly be made redundant as they no longer need design work (it’s a small part of my job). It’s a small company and I actually do many things, some of which no one else can do and the others they can’t do well (I have an ICT, marketing and design background and they are passing most of my work onto the assistant accountant). The redundancy is to cut costs apparently. Since the grievance the directors have hardly spoke to me and I suspect even though they went through procedures for me to suggest other work they had no plan in doing so.
To me what makes it double suspicious is that I requested flexible working hours for Friday afternoons and they declined on the basis I was too highly needed and could not be replaced in these times. Over the last 2 months they have increased pressure onto me to train other members of the team so that I am not the only one who knows things in the office as a kind of back up. Although now I suspect it was not for backup at all whilst I am here.
I have been offered minimum redundancy and asked to work my work notice.
My question is do you think I could have reasonable grounds for an unfair dismissal claim or strong argument for a higher redundancy package based on that I could have been unfairly dismissed?
Thank you for your help
- - - Updated - - -
I am a new user so can't answer PM messages
Comment