Hi
Could I ask for some help with this matter-
I was a director of a business (ltd) and it had a small debt to a customer.
Before the goods were delivered the company was struck off by companies house, all regrettable and I have sympathy with the customer, however.
The customer applied to court against 2 defendants, the company and myself personally.
The court granted against the company and myself personally. ( there may have been 2 steps hear cant remember)
I had the personal set aside.
Once again the customer applied against me. I believed myself covered by Ltd company protection, because as a director I have not been criticize in any way, I supplied the facts, stated my innocence and that the company was in the process of being wound up, by an insolvency practitioner, and thought that would be enough.
I was unable to attend the hearing and I thought the ability to make the debt personal to me would be impossible, however, not so.
I have not paid it, and have been "Order to attend court for questioning".
My question is why has a CCJ taken this route.
I live with my partner and the court insisted on details of her income, and property, I told them I was not at liberty to divulge such information as this was my debt not hers.
I expect to be recalled to court very soon, and may have to answer "contempt of court if I dont supply"
Please advise me how to proceed.
Birdman
Could I ask for some help with this matter-
I was a director of a business (ltd) and it had a small debt to a customer.
Before the goods were delivered the company was struck off by companies house, all regrettable and I have sympathy with the customer, however.
The customer applied to court against 2 defendants, the company and myself personally.
The court granted against the company and myself personally. ( there may have been 2 steps hear cant remember)
I had the personal set aside.
Once again the customer applied against me. I believed myself covered by Ltd company protection, because as a director I have not been criticize in any way, I supplied the facts, stated my innocence and that the company was in the process of being wound up, by an insolvency practitioner, and thought that would be enough.
I was unable to attend the hearing and I thought the ability to make the debt personal to me would be impossible, however, not so.
I have not paid it, and have been "Order to attend court for questioning".
My question is why has a CCJ taken this route.
I live with my partner and the court insisted on details of her income, and property, I told them I was not at liberty to divulge such information as this was my debt not hers.
I expect to be recalled to court very soon, and may have to answer "contempt of court if I dont supply"
Please advise me how to proceed.
Birdman


Comment