mackenzie hall

[ODC]

Re: mackenzie hall

Where have Muck Hall ever described themselves as solicitors?

[dogtired]

Re: mackenzie hall

Where have Muck Hall ever described themselves as solicitors?

It was the other DCA a company called Incasso LLP, sorry if I did not make that clearer.

[ODC]

Re: mackenzie hall

It was the other DCA a company called Incasso LLP, sorry if I did not make that clearer.

Nothing would surprise me about Muck Hall but if they claimed to be solicitors then that would be a criminal offence.
Never worry about them taking you to court. The only time they will see the inside of a court room will be as defendants

[beeb]

Re: mackenzie hall

i refer to post 14 on this page if any one can advise ,thanks. BEEB

[bluebottle]

Re: mackenzie hall

had automated reply from OFT I had asked them about the phone calls, apparently from a local number, from MacKenzie all but also the other DCA involved in my dispute they do not appear to be registered but as they style them selves solicitors I may have to look elsewhere to complain about them the plot thickens

To the best of my knowledge and belief, any business collecting debts is required to hold a Category F Debt Collection Licence issued by OFT Credit Licensing. OFT Credit Fitness assess and monitor licence-holders' or prospective licence-holders' fitness to hold or continue to hold a licence. Certificated bailiff companies who also collect non-public debt are required to be licensed. However, many public debt collection contracts contain a requirement that certificated bailiff companies tendering for such contracts must hold a valid and current OFT Debt Collection Licence.

[dogtired]

Re: mackenzie hall

i refer to post 14 on this page if any one can advise ,thanks. BEEB

Can BB or someone help beeb?

[bluebottle]

Re: mackenzie hall

i feel reasurd by all the feed back from members here, still not sure that black horse can make an agreement with me to pay £20 per month ,then hand it to mk and they trying to change our agreement by demanding the full ammount £4500) due ,is this right ? i have continued to keep up the payments of 20 pm and have not missed one since we agreed this @18 months ago . thank you all. BEEB.

Was the agreement with BH made as the result of a court judgement? Also, you need to find out if Mucky have bought the debt outright or are simply collecting on behalf of BH.

[beeb]

Re: mackenzie hall

thanks bb, the agreement was with BH, the called me (eventually) after tracking me down , because i had not been paying the loan. it was agreed on the phone that all i could pay was £20.00 a month,i have had correspondence since showing how much i have paid and how much is left to pay, its since this that MH have become involved and now they say they are seeking full payment !

[beeb]

Re: mackenzie hall

also , i really dont want to go chasing them to find out if they bought the debt, i am trying to stay out of theire way..... do you think i should investigate or simply leave well alone ? thanks all BEEB

[bluebottle]

Re: mackenzie hall

Unfortunately, Beeb, it does need to be established what rights Mucky Hall have with regard to the outstanding amount. When BH send you the correspondence, did they confirm in writing that they were happy to accept £20.00 per month? If anything, BH need to explain why Mucky Hall are now involved. Was the loan regulated under the CCA 1974-2006?