• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

£50k fire damage by ooc Leylandii

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • £50k fire damage by ooc Leylandii

    An absent neighbour land owner who allowed his Leylandii boundary hedging to reach 6m in height when the hedge caught fire facilitated a fire which spread to a neighbour and burnt down a £50k summerhouse. We are unable to find a solicitor to take the case. Any ideas?
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Presumably the owner failed to advise his household insurer about the summerhouse?
    Normally, as long as the insurer is made aware of its existence, a summerhouse would be covered as a domestic outbuilding.

    The summer house owner will need to show that the owner of the hedge has been negligent, and that negligence (failure to maintain the trees) either caused the fire or allowed it to spread.

    The first action is to write to the hedge owner, explain the circumstances and tell him he is being held liable and should either inform his liability insurers or indicate how he will reimburse the summerhouse owner

    Comment


    • #3
      Who started the fire / how did the fire start?

      Comment


      • #4
        Surely you have claimed on your insurance.

        I have to say that I am struggling to see the basis of a claim on the information given so far. It is possible that further details may lead me to change that view.
        Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.

        Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :

        https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by des8 View Post
          Presumably the owner failed to advise his household insurer about the summerhouse?
          Normally, as long as the insurer is made aware of its existence, a summerhouse would be covered as a domestic outbuilding.

          The summer house owner will need to show that the owner of the hedge has been negligent, and that negligence (failure to maintain the trees) either caused the fire or allowed it to spread.

          The first action is to write to the hedge owner, explain the circumstances and tell him he is being held liable and should either inform his liability insurers or indicate how he will reimburse the summerhouse owner
          The owner of the hedging denies liability so a fire expert will be commissioned to analyse videos and photos remotely to offer an expert assessment of the fire seat and etymology. Sadly the summerhouse was uninsured.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Mikezoeclem View Post
            The owner of the hedging denies liability so a fire expert will be commissioned to analyse videos and photos remotely to offer an expert assessment of the fire seat and etymology. Sadly the summerhouse was uninsured.
            An expert suggesting the 'Leylandii boundary hedging' was a factor in the fire spreading is one thing but proving the neighbour was negligent is something else entirely!

            What caused the fire to start in the first place? Had the neighbour previously been warned that their hedge was a fire hazard?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by HariSeldon View Post

              An expert suggesting the 'Leylandii boundary hedging' was a factor in the fire spreading is one thing but proving the neighbour was negligent is something else entirely!

              What caused the fire to start in the first place? Had the neighbour previously been warned that their hedge was a fire hazard?
              Correct. The owner had been warned about the Leylandii and had cut the eastern tow down 12 months b4. It’s hoped the video evidence will confirm the seat though not the instigator.

              Comment

              View our Terms and Conditions

              LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

              If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


              If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
              Working...
              X