Sister and I are co-executors and co-beneficiaries. Probate has been granted however she insists that the probate valuation is the 'true' valuation and therefore she's only willing to buy my ownership share at that price, with a small addition based on her calculation for house price rises. The probate valuation was carried out in 2023. I disagree - for one thing I'd want a current valuation and secondly private offers have historically been much higher (the property comes with land attached which developers would love to get). How to proceed?
Disagreement over valuation of inherited property between co-beneficiaries
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
The most desirable course is to come to an agreement: easy for me to say. The obvious thing would be to take advice from good local estate agents on how to market the property to realise the best return.
In the absence of agreement you can go to court under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 seeking an order of the court requiring the property to be sold.
Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
- 1 thank
-
My sister 100% will not budge on her offer. She allowed estate agents to visit and make estimates. However she refuses to use their estimations, and will not allow the property to be put on market to determine a value that way, either. I'm not sure if legally I can do that - besides how can I invite estate agents to market a property if I am only co-owner? And what'd stop her sabotaging that anyway?Originally posted by atticus View PostThe most desirable course is to come to an agreement: easy for me to say. The obvious thing would be to take advice from good local estate agents on how to market the property to realise the best return.
In the absence of agreement you can go to court under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 seeking an order of the court requiring the property to be sold.
I don't want to reach the point of having to force a property sale. Given how fixated she is on owning the place outright, I'm amazed she's willing to risk that and go through the waste of money. I really feel like I would have the stronger claim (she hasn't tried to get any current valuations, won't negotiate, won't communicate, and I don't want to bring this to the judge's attention but she did use the address to fraudulently enrol her son in a local school when she does not live there).
Is there a lesser option before forcing a sale that the law can help us reach?
Comment
-
She won't budge? Well tell her neither will you! If current open market value is higher than probate value you are losing out on your 50% inheritance by selling at undervalue. So don't sell until she raises her offer.
If you are a co-executor, both named as Executor on Probate, then you are entitled to get an estate agent valuation without her agreement. After all, sounds like she got one without telling you....Last edited by PallasAthena; 11th March 2025, 10:28:AM.All opinions expressed are based on my personal experience. I am not a lawyer and do not hold any legal qualifications.
- 1 thank
Comment
-
One option is for you to agree your sister's terms.Originally posted by Kathman50 View Post
My sister 100% will not budge on her offer. She allowed estate agents to visit and make estimates. However she refuses to use their estimations, and will not allow the property to be put on market to determine a value that way, either. I'm not sure if legally I can do that - besides how can I invite estate agents to market a property if I am only co-owner? And what'd stop her sabotaging that anyway?
I don't want to reach the point of having to force a property sale. Given how fixated she is on owning the place outright, I'm amazed she's willing to risk that and go through the waste of money. I really feel like I would have the stronger claim (she hasn't tried to get any current valuations, won't negotiate, won't communicate, and I don't want to bring this to the judge's attention but she did use the address to fraudulently enrol her son in a local school when she does not live there).
Is there a lesser option before forcing a sale that the law can help us reach?
If you are not willing to do that, then something (or someone) will have to give. You could try mediation - which like the tango takes two - or some other way of reaching agreement. If you cannot come to an agreement, then there is the blunt instrument of the court process as stated in post #2.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
- 1 thank
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.


Comment