Good evening, and thank you in advance for any help that you may be able to provide. I hope that I'm posting in the correct area.
My friends father passed recently. He drew up a will in 1993 with a local solicitors practice, naming his daughter, (my friend) and the solicitor who was drawing up the will as joint executors. Since there is a house to dispose of within the estate, she is informed that his affairs have to go through probate, even though his estate does not reach the current financial ceiling. My friend visited the solicitors practice to discuss this and was told that the solicitor named on the will has now left the practice. They informed her that they will have to contact him to request that he rescinds his role as executor. Whilst this seems reasonable, they are suggesting that there will be a charge for this service, which to me seems a little harsh. Is it not an administrative issue that has arisen through their failure to contact my friends father when the solicitor originally left the practice? Should he ever have been named personally?
My friends father passed recently. He drew up a will in 1993 with a local solicitors practice, naming his daughter, (my friend) and the solicitor who was drawing up the will as joint executors. Since there is a house to dispose of within the estate, she is informed that his affairs have to go through probate, even though his estate does not reach the current financial ceiling. My friend visited the solicitors practice to discuss this and was told that the solicitor named on the will has now left the practice. They informed her that they will have to contact him to request that he rescinds his role as executor. Whilst this seems reasonable, they are suggesting that there will be a charge for this service, which to me seems a little harsh. Is it not an administrative issue that has arisen through their failure to contact my friends father when the solicitor originally left the practice? Should he ever have been named personally?

Comment