• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Horizon scandal forum subversion 2002

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Horizon scandal forum subversion 2002

    Documented evidence of forum subversion originating from office of Attorney general in 2002, Proceedings aborted for obvious reasons as a pre warning of a kangaroo court Vs government intervention in employment tribunal would inevitably create insurmountable obstacles. This is believed to be event 1 of the now revealed 2700 justice miscarriages and the government need to be sued for perverting the course of justice and facilitating 2699 additional event including 4 suicides and 900 custodials and an ITV drama Mr Bates vs Post Office, How do i sue Blair cabinet S Yorks police Attorney General Home sec etc by relying on new evidence emanating from recently concluded Horizon enquiry ? First instance of perverted justice dated Sept 7th 1998 - S Y Police collusion 1999- 2004 with embarrassed counsel evidence offer as witness 1999 and Post Office legal headed up by Mandy Talbot famous for the 300k of taxpayer money to bankrupt the Will Mellor Character in Mr Bates -(Lee Castleton) - seeking to recover embarrassed counsel offered evidence without the need for corrupt police in S Yorks, Pro Bono court of appeal ?
    Tags: None

  • #2
    What standing do you believe you have to sue?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by buskinbusman View Post
      ...by relying on new evidence emanating from recently concluded Horizon enquiry ?
      The enquiry has not concluded. It will finish collecting evidence in two weeks time but then it will be who-knows-how-long before it publishes its final report.
      Last edited by PallasAthena; 7th December 2024, 17:04:PM.
      All opinions expressed are based on my personal experience. I am not a lawyer and do not hold any legal qualifications.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by EXC View Post
        What standing do you believe you have to sue?
        police corruption in the original investigation and new evidence reveal by witness Mandy Talbot Sept 2023 and ITV drama and daytime TV with Lee Castleton, Castleton an i have had identical experience at the hands of Talbot and her police bribed colleagues. Case of Sept 7th 98 unlimited remedy contains rider "if we are found to be wrong" and there is now ample evidence that tribunal were wrong, Evidence available to police via embarrassed counsel in 1999 and available to anyone able to access you tube evidence of Sept 2023, Re visit a dismissed case which relied on a false instrument and use of a monopoly postal system for evidence planting, If this were case 1 of 2700 then the 390 million pounds of post office legal spend praps explains why the original case was dismissed, Alan Bates has moved the dial a bit on the disparity of litigant in person Vs Post Office and police,
        Last edited by buskinbusman; 7th December 2024, 19:41:PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          This case has got huge publicity, 'every person and their dog' knows about it.

          This is surely about approaching the 'right people' with the 'evidence', even if it's incomplete.

          Example, this was all about Horizon, now concerns has been raised about the system before 'Horizon', called 'Capture'. I think it's a case of using the 'megaphone' in the right places i.e. MP's, media etc.

          Comment


          • #6
            I am still not clear on your link to the Horizon scandal.

            Are you, or were you at any time, a sub-postmaster who was prosecuted or threatened with prosecution or civil action or otherwise proceeded against by the Post Office?
            Last edited by PallasAthena; 8th December 2024, 10:02:AM.
            All opinions expressed are based on my personal experience. I am not a lawyer and do not hold any legal qualifications.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by buskinbusman View Post

              police corruption in the original investigation and new evidence reveal by witness Mandy Talbot Sept 2023 and ITV drama and daytime TV with Lee Castleton, Castleton an i have had identical experience at the hands of Talbot and her police bribed colleagues. Case of Sept 7th 98 unlimited remedy contains rider "if we are found to be wrong" and there is now ample evidence that tribunal were wrong, Evidence available to police via embarrassed counsel in 1999 and available to anyone able to access you tube evidence of Sept 2023, Re visit a dismissed case which relied on a false instrument and use of a monopoly postal system for evidence planting, If this were case 1 of 2700 then the 390 million pounds of post office legal spend praps explains why the original case was dismissed, Alan Bates has moved the dial a bit on the disparity of litigant in person Vs Post Office and police,
              I don't understand the connection. There was no police involvement in Lee Castleton's case as it was a civil action brought in the High Court and Mandy Talbot was a civil lawyer.

              Comment


              • #8
                Mandy Talbot is sooooo much more than a civil lawyer. She has an unrevealed source of 320k. Personally I'd remember the source of that but she can't. Police were involved in MY fit up which was a blueprint copycat process on Lee Castleton. Police involvement is covert Mates of Mandy so you won't know if Lee Castleton was joint enterprise but mine is documented FB Buskin Busman. Home sec at the time was a fully appraised David Blunkett whose constituency also hosted a post office at ground zero event 1. Far better it from me to suggest his silence was rewarded or indeed Alan Johnson CWU to Blair cabinet but my 21 years membership didn't get me an advocate for relentless fit ups pre dating Lee Castleton and Alan Bates.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Er yes, that's all as clear as mud. We seem to be heading for tin foil hat territory so I'm out of this thread. Good luck.
                  All opinions expressed are based on my personal experience. I am not a lawyer and do not hold any legal qualifications.

                  Comment

                  View our Terms and Conditions

                  LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                  If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                  If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                  Working...
                  X