• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

County court claim- 3rd time posting/ unsure if Im doing it correctly 🫣

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    This is the draft of my witness statement, what do you think?


    COVER SHEET
    IN THE CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE

    Claim No: xxxxx

    Between:
    XXXXXX Claimant
    and
    XXXXXX – Defendant


    DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED
    Date: [Insert Date]
    To Whom It May Concern,
    Please find enclosed the following documents in relation to the above claim:
    1. Defendant’s Witness Statement in response to the Claimant’s N244 application dated 5th February 2025, and
    2. Completed Form N180 – Directions Questionnaire.
    These documents are submitted in accordance with the court’s General Directions Order dated 19th March 2025.
    If further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact me at the details below.
    Kind regards,
    [Your Full Name]
    [Your Address]
    [Your Phone Number]
    [Your Email Address]
    Signed: _______________________
    Date: _________________________










    WITNESS STATEMENT OF [XXXXX] (DEFENDANT)
    I, [XXXX] of [Address], make this statement in response to the Claimant’s application dated 5th February 2025 to lift the stay on the above claim. I make this statement from my own knowledge unless otherwise stated, and believe the facts contained herein to be true.


    1. Introduction
    1.1 I am the Defendant in this matter.
    1.2 I oppose the Claimant’s application to lift the stay that has been in place since August 2024.
    1.3 The claim has been inactive for nearly six months, during which time I received no further directions or communications from the court or the Claimant regarding progression of the case.


    2. Background and Timeline
    2.1 I received the claim from the Civil National Business Centre (Northampton County Court) on 27th June 2024.
    2.2 I filed my Defence on 20th July 2024.
    2.3 I received a Notice of Acknowledgement of Defence, dated 22nd July 2024, which stated that the Claimant was required to notify the court within 28 days if they intended to proceed.
    2.4 No further contact or action occurred until I received a General Directions Order dated 19th March 2025, enclosing the Claimant’s N244 application dated 5th February 2025.
    2.5 During this time, the claim was stayed due to the Claimant’s inaction.


    3. Document Requests and Non-Compliance
    3.1 On 5th July 2024, I sent a CPR 31.14 request to the Claimant’s solicitor (Kearns Solicitors), requesting disclosure of documents referred to in the Particulars of Claim — specifically the agreement, Default Notice, and Notice of Assignment.
    3.2 I also issued a Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) request directly to the Claimant (LC Asset 2 S.A.R.L) on the same date, along with the required £1 statutory fee.
    3.3 The Claimant did not respond to either request until September 2024, after the claim had already been stayed.
    3.4 The late disclosure of documents hindered my ability to fully assess the nature of the claim at an earlier stage.


    4. Statute-Barred Debt
    4.1 Among the documents provided in September 2024 was a statement indicating that the last activity on the alleged account occurred in August 2014.
    4.2 I have not made any payment or acknowledged the debt in writing since that time.
    4.3 As such, I believe the claim is statute-barred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980, as more than six years have passed without any relevant activity.
    4.4 The Claimant has not provided any evidence to suggest otherwise.
    4.5 At the time I filed my Defence in July 2024, I had not received any documentation and was therefore unable to assess whether the claim might be statute-barred.
    4.6 Once the documentation was eventually received in September 2024, I was able to establish that the claim likely falls outside the statutory limitation period.





    5. Alleged Attempts to Engage
    5.1 The Claimant states that they attempted to engage with me via letters dated 31st October 2024, 5th December 2024, 6th January 2025, and 20th January 2025, inviting me to withdraw my Defence and submit a full admission with a payment proposal.
    5.2 I recall receiving letters of this nature; however, I chose not to respond.
    5.3 I had already filed a valid Defence and considered the matter to be within the court’s remit. I contacted the court at the time and was informed that there was no obligation to respond to the Claimant's correspondence.
    5.4 The Claimant's letters did not address the core issues raised in my Defence — including the lack of supporting documents and potential limitation — and appeared to be an attempt to pressure me into admitting liability for a debt I had formally disputed.
    5.5 I have fully complied with my obligations under the Civil Procedure Rules, and there was no requirement to engage in private settlement discussions following the stay.


    6. Prejudice and Emotional Impact
    6.1 The prolonged delay in progressing the claim and the sudden reactivation after a lengthy stay have caused me considerable emotional distress.
    6.2 The uncertainty surrounding the unresolved litigation has been mentally taxing, particularly given the absence of meaningful communication from the Claimant during the stayed period.
    6.3 I have acted reasonably and in good faith throughout the process, seeking documentation and clarity from the outset, only to be met with delay and vague correspondence.
    6.4 Allowing the claim to be reinstated now would cause unnecessary prejudice and continue the emotional strain caused by this drawn-out process.


    7. Conclusion
    7.1 The Claimant has failed to pursue the claim diligently, provided no explanation for the six-month delay, and only disclosed relevant documents after the claim had already been stayed.
    7.2 The documentation now shows that the alleged debt is likely statute-barred, and therefore unenforceable.
    7.3 I respectfully request that the Court refuses the Claimant’s application to lift the stay and considers whether the claim should be struck out as being without merit or prospect of success.


    Statement of Truth
    I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true.
    Signed: _______________________

    [XXXX NAME]
    [Date]

    Comment


    • #62
      ** I have now added in [Exhibit A] to [Exhibit D] and will send evidence of the following:

      2.2 I filed my Defence on 20th July 2024 [Exhibit A]

      3.1 On 5th July 2024, I sent a CPR 31.14 request to the Claimant’s solicitor (Kearns Solicitors), requesting disclosure of documents referred to in the Particulars of Claim — specifically the agreement, Default Notice, and Notice of Assignment [Exhibit B]
      3.2 I also issued a Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) request directly to the Claimant (LC Asset 2 S.A.R.L) on the same date, along with the required £1 statutory fee. [Exhibit C]

      4.1 Among the documents provided on 31st October 2024 was a statement indicating that the last activity on the alleged account occurred 13th August 2024 [Exhibit D]

      Comment


      • #63
        IMO that's brilliant
        Only a suggestion; On the front page perhaps the title DEFENDANT'S WITNESS STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO LIFTING OF THE STAY

        Comment


        • #64
          Brilliant, thanks so much. I typed this up using your advice, the templates you pointed me to and chatGpt

          I really appreciate the help

          Comment


          • #65
            For point 6 you could use the following case law:

            To lift a stay the following test of "appropriateness" should be applied.

            In applying this test Chief Master Marsh considered Football Association Premier league LTD v O'Donovan (2017) EWHC 152 (Ch). :

            1. Whether the claimant had an adequate explanation for the delay

            xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

            2. Whether the claimant's claim has (at least) a real prospect of success

            xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxx

            3. The defendant's behaviour and whether any of the delay was caused by the defendant

            xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

            4. The nature and extent of any prejudice the defendant would suffer in the event that the stay is lifted

            xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

            5. Whether any attempts were made by the claimant in the 6 months to revive the claim

            xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

            Note this case was for a 6 month delay not 7 months.


            Comment


            • #66
              Thanks so much echat11 - would I add that in? Put my information where the xxxxx is or is the xxxxx for spaces? Sorry if I sound daft

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Kanga86 View Post
                Thanks so much echat11 - would I add that in? Put my information where the xxxxx is or is the xxxxx for spaces? Sorry if I sound daft
                So replace 6, change the Heading to Appropriateness and Prejudice / Emotional Impact

                then underneath, post 65, the bit in bold, so your answers where the XXXXXXXXXX are.
                Think about the questions, remember you may be asked about them. You might have already
                answered some in 6.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Hi echat11 Pezza54 below is version 2 of the witness statement with amendments suggested. Could I get your thoughts on it?

                  Many thanks again



                  COVER SHEET
                  IN THE CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE

                  Claim No: L4HC8G28

                  Between:
                  LC Asset 2 S.A.R.L – Claimant
                  and
                  [NAME] – Defendant


                  DOCUMENTS ENCLOSED

                  Date: 25TH March 2025.
                  To Whom It May Concern,
                  Please find enclosed the following documents in relation to the above claim:
                  1. DEFENDANT'S WITNESS STATEMENT IN OPPOSITION TO LIFTING OF THE STAY in response to the Claimant’s N244 application dated 5th February 2025, and
                  2. COMPLETED FORM – N180. DIRECTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE
                  These documents are submitted in accordance with the court’s General Directions Order dated 19th March 2025.
                  If further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact me at the details below.
                  Kind regards,

                  [NAME
                  ADDRESS
                  PHONE NUMBER
                  EMAIL ADDRESS]


                  Signed: _______________________
                  Date: _________________________








                  WITNESS STATEMENT OF [name xxxx] (DEFENDANT) IN OPPOSITION OF LIFTING THE STAY.
                  CLAIM NUMBER xxxxx

                  I, [NAME], of [ADDRESS], make this statement in response to the Claimant’s application dated 5th February 2025 to lift the stay on the above claim. I make this statement from my own knowledge unless otherwise stated, and believe the facts contained herein to be true.


                  1. Introduction
                  1.1 I am the Defendant in this matter.
                  1.2 I oppose the Claimant’s application to lift the stay that has been in place since August 2024.
                  1.3 The claim has been inactive for nearly six months, during which time I received no further directions or communications from the court or the Claimant regarding progression of the case.


                  2. Background and Timeline
                  2.1 I received the claim from the Civil National Business Centre (Northampton County Court) on 27th June 2024.
                  2.2 I filed my Defence on 20th July 2024 [EXHIBIT A]
                  2.3 I received a Notice of Acknowledgement of Defence, dated 22nd July 2024, which stated that the Claimant was required to notify the court within 28 days if they intended to proceed.
                  2.4 No further contact or action occurred until I received a General Directions Order dated 19th March 2025, enclosing the Claimant’s N244 application dated 5th February 2025.
                  2.5 During this time, the claim was stayed due to the Claimant’s inaction.


                  3. Document Requests and Non-Compliance
                  3.1 On 5th July 2024, I sent a CPR 31.14 request to the Claimant’s solicitor (Kearns Solicitors), requesting disclosure of documents referred to in the Particulars of Claim — specifically the agreement, Default Notice, and Notice of Assignment [EXHIBIT B]
                  3.2 I also issued a Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA) request directly to the Claimant (LC Asset 2 S.A.R.L) on the same date, along with the required £1 statutory fee [EXHIBIT C]
                  3.3 The Claimant did not respond to either request until 31ST October 2024, after the claim had already been stayed.
                  3.4 The late disclosure of documents hindered my ability to fully assess the nature of the claim at an earlier stage.


                  4. Statute-Barred Debt
                  4.1 Among the documents provided in October 2024 was a statement indicating that the last activity on the alleged account occurred in August 2014 [EXHIBIT D]
                  4.2 There is no evidence of any payment or written acknowledgment of the debt since that time.
                  4.3 As such, I believe the claim is statute-barred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980, as more than six years have passed without any relevant activity.
                  4.4 The Claimant has not provided any evidence to suggest otherwise.
                  4.5 At the time I filed my Defence in July 2024, I had not received any documentation and was therefore unable to assess whether the claim might be statute-barred.
                  4.6 Once the documentation was eventually received In October 2024, I was able to establish that the claim likely falls outside the statutory limitation period.


                  5. Alleged Attempts to Engage
                  5.1 The Claimant states that they attempted to engage with me via letters dated 31st October 2024, 5th December 2024, 6th January 2025, and 20th January 2025, inviting me to withdraw my Defence and submit a full admission with a payment proposal.
                  5.2 I recall receiving letters of this nature; however, I chose not to respond.
                  5.3 I had already filed a valid Defence and considered the matter to be within the court’s remit. I contacted the court at the time and was informed that there was no obligation to respond to the Claimant's correspondence.
                  5.4 The Claimant's letters did not address the core issues raised in my Defence — including the lack of supporting documents and potential limitation — and appeared to be an attempt to pressure me into admitting liability for a debt I had formally disputed.
                  5.5 I have fully complied with my obligations under the Civil Procedure Rules, and there was no requirement to engage in private settlement discussions following the stay.


                  6. Appropriateness and Prejudice / Emotional Impact
                  To lift a stay the following test of "appropriateness" should be applied.

                  In applying this test Chief Master Marsh considered Football Association Premier league LTD v O'Donovan (2017) EWHC 152 (Ch):

                  1. Whether the Claimant had an adequate explanation for the delay
                  The Claimant has provided no adequate explanation for the six-month delay between the stay taking effect and the filing of their N244 application. No reasons have been given for why the claim was not progressed in a timely manner following the filing of my Defence in July 2024. The court’s Acknowledgement of Defence (dated 22nd July 2024) made clear that the Claimant was required to notify the court within 28 days if they wished to proceed, which they failed to do.

                  2. Whether the Claimant's claim has (at least) a real prospect of success
                  Based on the documents provided by the Claimant 31st October 2024, there appears to be no evidence of any payment or written acknowledgment of the alleged debt since August 2014. As such, I believe the claim is statute-barred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act 1980. The Claimant has not provided any evidence to suggest the limitation period has been interrupted or reset, and therefore the claim appears to lack a reasonable prospect of success.

                  3. The Defendant’s behaviour and whether any of the delay was caused by the Defendant
                  I have complied with all procedural obligations, including filing my Defence within the required timeframe and submitting document requests under CPR 31.14 and the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on 5th July 2024. The delay was not caused by any action or inaction on my part. I did not respond to later letters from the Claimant because the matter was before the court and stayed; I had been advised that I was under no obligation to engage further unless directed by the court.
                  I have acted reasonably and in good faith throughout the process, seeking documentation and clarity from the outset, only to be met with delay and vague correspondence. The uncertainty surrounding the unresolved litigation has been mentally taxing, particularly given the absence of meaningful communication from the Claimant during the stayed period.

                  4. The nature and extent of any prejudice the Defendant would suffer in the event that the stay is lifted
                  Allowing the stay to be lifted would cause significant prejudice. The prolonged delay and sudden reactivation of the claim after it had been stayed for nearly six months have caused me considerable emotional and psychological distress. The uncertainty surrounding unresolved litigation, especially without any meaningful communication from the Claimant during that time, has been mentally taxing.
                  Having reasonably believed the matter had concluded due to the Claimant’s inaction, the reactivation of the claim has caused unnecessary disruption and distress. There has also been a loss of opportunity to investigate or respond to the case more thoroughly, as key information was only provided after the claim had been stayed. Lifting the stay now would unfairly prolong the emotional strain caused by this drawn-out process.

                  5. Whether any attempts were made by the Claimant in the six months to revive the claim
                  No application was made to the court to lift the stay until 5th February 2025, nearly six months after it took effect. While the Claimant did send letters in October 2024, December 2024, and January 2025 inviting me to admit the claim, these did not constitute formal steps to revive the proceedings. The letters also failed to address the issues raised in my Defence or the delayed provision of documentation. No justification was provided for why a formal application was not made sooner.


                  7. Conclusion
                  7.1 The Claimant has failed to pursue the claim diligently, provided no explanation for the six-month delay, and only disclosed relevant documents after the claim had already been stayed.
                  7.2 The documentation now shows that the alleged debt is likely statute-barred, and therefore unenforceable.
                  7.3 I respectfully request that the Court refuses the Claimant’s application to lift the stay and considers whether the claim should be struck out as being without merit or prospect of success.







                  Statement of Truth

                  I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

                  Signed: _______________________

                  [name'

                  Dated: [Insert Date]





                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Under 1.3 it may be better to write "The claim has now been stayed for seven months,........"

                    Again under 4 first line omit "sudden" and write "reactivation of the claim after it has been stayed for seven months would cause me........"

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Thank you Pezza54 . I think it has been a little less than 6 months though, from 22nd August 2024 (based on defence receipt date of 22nd July) to 5th February 2025 (date of application to lift the stay- I only received the documents dated 19th March but it does have 5th February dated on their application)

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        You need to be clear on the period you are talking about,

                        5. Whether any attempts were made by the Claimant in the six months to revive the claim
                        No application was made to the court to lift the stay until 5th February 2025, nearly six months after it took effect.

                        Revert back to your Witness Statement in post 61.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          So sorry, Im not following. I originally thought it was almost 7 months due to the date of the defence receipt (22nd July 2024) but it states on there that the claim will be stayed 28 days after the claimant receives a copy (which Im assuming would be 18th August 2024. I say assuming because there was no communication after that until I rang the court for confirmation in December 2024). So its just 2 weeks under 6 months later when the claimant filed their application.

                          I have amended September to October … Im not sure why I even typed September in the first place… but the letter with all the documents I requested is dated 31st October 2024.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Kanga86 View Post
                            So sorry, Im not following. I originally thought it was almost 7 months due to the date of the defence receipt (22nd July 2024) but it states on there that the claim will be stayed 28 days after the claimant receives a copy (which Im assuming would be 18th August 2024. I say assuming because there was no communication after that until I rang the court for confirmation in December 2024). So its just 2 weeks under 6 months later when the claimant filed their application.

                            I have amended September to October … Im not sure why I even typed September in the first place… but the letter with all the documents I requested is dated 31st October 2024.
                            The important thing is, how long the stay has been in place.You need to be factually correct in your Witness Statement.
                            You can't 'magic up' whatever period is short of 6 months. Then the rest of your statement looks 'less credible'.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Sorry, yes, I see what you’re saying. The final “version” of the WS above has all the correct dates as per the paperwork I have. I never received confirmation of the claim being stayed (not sure if I should have?) so I am working off the receipt letter dated 22nd July 2024 until the date on the claimant’s application, which is 5th February 2025. I received the directions questionnaire pack dated 19th March but everything I have put in the ws is going off the date of their application… which is just under 6 months.

                              Does that effect anything? With it being (literally 2 weeks) under 6 months later?

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Kanga86 View Post
                                Sorry, yes, I see what you’re saying. The final “version” of the WS above has all the correct dates as per the paperwork I have. I never received confirmation of the claim being stayed (not sure if I should have?) so I am working off the receipt letter dated 22nd July 2024 until the date on the claimant’s application, which is 5th February 2025. I received the directions questionnaire pack dated 19th March but everything I have put in the ws is going off the date of their application… which is just under 6 months.

                                Does that effect anything? With it being (literally 2 weeks) under 6 months later?
                                Yes, it does matter and is wrong.

                                You don't need to assume anything, you could ring the Court and they would give you the actual date the 'stay' was put into place.

                                If it's not 6 months or over, you can't use a case which might support 'stays' not being lifted which have been in place for over 6 months.


                                Comment

                                View our Terms and Conditions

                                LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

                                If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


                                If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
                                Working...
                                X