I was unable to reply to the initial thread (as at the bottom of this thread) so am hoping for more input. I did as suggested and wrote to the claimant and contacted moneyclaim.gov who were useless although the claimant states she has now written to the court stating the following and I am Lost - Where do I turn and how do I reply?
I am unsure even how to have the claim struck out
Letter/Email from Claimant
Dear Madam
Thank you for your recent correspondence.
I am writing to confirm that I have absolutely no objection to this matter being transferred to the HIgh Court, but would remind you of the costs implication of this matter proceeding through the multi-track in the High Court in the event that your defence is unsuccessful.
I have written to the Court confirming that I have no objection to this matter being transferred to the High Court but pointing out that I do not think that this matter merits the time and costs that would be placed on the High Court in dealing with this matter. I believe my argument is supported by the Civil Procedure Rules that deal with the Court's overriding objective as follows:-
23rd September 2020, 09:00:AM
I have received a Money Claim for Defamation through moneyclaims.service.gov.uk for £5,500. I have evidence to enable me to deny or Counterclaim although my understanding was Moneyclaim.gov can not be used for Defamation/Libel/Slader and that its a High court process?
T
EXC
23rd September 2020, 09:16:AM
Correct, at least not without the written consent of both parties.
See CPR 2.9 (1) https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pr...t07/pd_part07a
The problem with it is that nobody at Moneyclaim Online vets the claims so you need to write to the claimant and tell them to discontinue the claim, otherwise you'll apply to have the claim struck out and hold him liable for the £255 application fee.
I am unsure even how to have the claim struck out
Letter/Email from Claimant
Dear Madam
Thank you for your recent correspondence.
I am writing to confirm that I have absolutely no objection to this matter being transferred to the HIgh Court, but would remind you of the costs implication of this matter proceeding through the multi-track in the High Court in the event that your defence is unsuccessful.
I have written to the Court confirming that I have no objection to this matter being transferred to the High Court but pointing out that I do not think that this matter merits the time and costs that would be placed on the High Court in dealing with this matter. I believe my argument is supported by the Civil Procedure Rules that deal with the Court's overriding objective as follows:-
‘(1) These Rules are a new procedural code with the overriding objective of enabling the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost.
(2) Dealing with a case justly and at proportionate cost includes, so far as is practicable—
(a) ensuring that the parties are on an equal footing;
(b) saving expense;
(c) dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate—
(i) to the amount of money involved;
(ii) to the importance of the case;
(iii) to the complexity of the issues; and
(iv) to the financial position of each party;
(d) ensuring that it is dealt with expeditiously and fairly;
(e) allotting to it an appropriate share of the court's resources, while taking into account the need to allot resources to other cases; and
(f) enforcing compliance with rules, practice directions and orders.
I would particularly refer you to the (e) which states "allotting to it an appropriate share of the court's resources, while taking into account the need to allot resources to other cases;" and taking into consideration the pressures on the Court at the present time I do not consider that this is matter that needs to be dealt with in the High Court but this is of course a matter for the Judge and it will be for him/her to make that decision.
With regard to your seeking to strike this matter out I confirm that as I have stated clearly in this correspondence that I have no issue at all with this matter being transferred to the High Court I will of course bring this letter to the attention of the Court if you seek to recover your costs in respect of any such application, which in all the circumstances I will oppose.
Yours faithfully
Defamation Claim(2) Dealing with a case justly and at proportionate cost includes, so far as is practicable—
(a) ensuring that the parties are on an equal footing;
(b) saving expense;
(c) dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate—
(i) to the amount of money involved;
(ii) to the importance of the case;
(iii) to the complexity of the issues; and
(iv) to the financial position of each party;
(d) ensuring that it is dealt with expeditiously and fairly;
(e) allotting to it an appropriate share of the court's resources, while taking into account the need to allot resources to other cases; and
(f) enforcing compliance with rules, practice directions and orders.
I would particularly refer you to the (e) which states "allotting to it an appropriate share of the court's resources, while taking into account the need to allot resources to other cases;" and taking into consideration the pressures on the Court at the present time I do not consider that this is matter that needs to be dealt with in the High Court but this is of course a matter for the Judge and it will be for him/her to make that decision.
With regard to your seeking to strike this matter out I confirm that as I have stated clearly in this correspondence that I have no issue at all with this matter being transferred to the High Court I will of course bring this letter to the attention of the Court if you seek to recover your costs in respect of any such application, which in all the circumstances I will oppose.
Yours faithfully
23rd September 2020, 09:00:AM
I have received a Money Claim for Defamation through moneyclaims.service.gov.uk for £5,500. I have evidence to enable me to deny or Counterclaim although my understanding was Moneyclaim.gov can not be used for Defamation/Libel/Slader and that its a High court process?
T
EXC
23rd September 2020, 09:16:AM
Correct, at least not without the written consent of both parties.
See CPR 2.9 (1) https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/pr...t07/pd_part07a
The problem with it is that nobody at Moneyclaim Online vets the claims so you need to write to the claimant and tell them to discontinue the claim, otherwise you'll apply to have the claim struck out and hold him liable for the £255 application fee.
Comment