• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Refund for services not provided?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Refund for services not provided?

    HI,
    I booked myself in for a fat freezing treatment a few months ago. I went for my consultation and treatment all in one appointment, but when I got to the appointment it turned out I couldn't have it done as I don't have enough fat in the area for the applicator to get a good grip.
    they offered me an alternative treatment however that treatment is totally different and has different side effects which I am not happy to proceed with.
    I put in a refund request to the Head office and it was declined with them stating that they have a no refunds policy. They said i could have a 50% refund or a gift card to offer the treatment to a friend.
    I disputed this and said that as I haven't received the treatment I booked, contented and paid for i should be entitled to a fu refund and that I wasn't comfortable having the alternative treatment done. The advisor told me if I wasn't happy I could "get a lawyer "
    What is the next step from here please? I feel like they are trying to use an unenforceable term with the "non refundable" clause even when it was their beautician who said i wasnt suitable for the fat freezing.
    please advise as I would just like to get my hard earned money back at this point.
    thank you so much!
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Is this UK

    Comment


    • #3
      ostell hi yes it is

      Comment


      • #4
        Suggest you have a look at Consumer Rights Act 2015 Schedule 2 (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga...dule/2/enacted)

        There is also the possibility that as the contract could not be performed it was void ab initio i.e. the contract was formed on the basis of a fundamental common mistake viz both parties thought the procedure was capable of being performed.

        Comment

        View our Terms and Conditions

        LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

        If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


        If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
        Working...
        X