• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Hello and help?

Collapse
Loading...
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hello and help?

    Hi all, I'm looking for help after filing a small claims defence for a private parking ticket defence and in receipt of claimants Directions Questionnaire. I chard the court as had not received my own DQ who said the defence was struck out due to non return of DQ. I understand I am to complete an N244 however am I to pay a fee for this? It was no fault of my own or do the court consider non receipt of paperwork no excuse? Please direct me to correct area of forum. Thanks in advance.
    Tags: None

  • #2
    Hi,

    The Civil Procedure Rules under 26.3(7A) say that if a party does not comply by the required date then the court will send them a further notice requiring compliance within 7 days otherwise the defence will then be struck out.

    If the Court hasn't issued the DQ or even if it did and you did not receive it, but the court then failed to comply with CPR 26.3(7A), there should be little argument that the defence should be reinstated. Provided you submit the DQ along with your application and evidence, then the court should dispense with the DQ requirement and allocate to the small claims track.

    As to application fees, you would be liable to pay which is £255 unless you qualify for a fee exemption due to low income - for more info on this you can follow this link https://www.gov.uk/get-help-with-court-fees

    Regardless, an application to set aside the strike out is necessary and the court should check the file to see if (a) the DQ was sent out in the first place and (b) if it was, did they follow up wtih a reminder giving 7 days. If the answer being no to either, your defence should be reinstated.

    If the court is at fault you might find it difficult to recover the £255 though you would be well advised to ask the judge that the court should bear these costs since they were at fault and it is inherently unfair for you to incur costs and expenses for something that wasn't your fault, rather it was the court's.

    If the judge refuses your request, then you could make a complaint to the court itself and if they do not uphold your complaint then try writing to your local MP who can refer the matter to the Parliamentary and Health Ombudsman to see if they will award compensation. Otherwise, you would have to sue HM Courts and Tribunals Service which is an executive of the Ministry of Justice.

    You can read an example where someone was awarded compensation by the Ombudsman below but I am guessing your priority is for the defence to be reinstated.

    https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/about-u...-summaries/745

    If you have a question about the voluntary termination process, please read this guide first, as it should have all the answers you need. Please do not hijack another person's thread as I will not respond to you
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    LEGAL DISCLAIMER
    Please be aware that this is a public forum and is therefore accessible to anyone. The content I post on this forum is not intended to be legal advice nor does it establish any client-lawyer type relationship between you and me. Therefore any use of my content is at your own risk and I cannot be held responsible in any way. It is always recommended that you seek independent legal advice.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you kindly ROB! On it, will update...

      Comment


      • #4
        PS please clarify if you may 'Provided you submit the DQ along with your application and evidence, then the court should dispense with the DQ requirement and allocate to the small claims track.' - is this via form N244 and is the fee still payable in advance even if they decide the reinstate the defence? Thanks again, Sophie

        Comment


        • #5
          Well your N244 application will need to be supported by evidence through a witness statement, so it would probably be prudent to tag a sentence or two at the end of the WS saying that to assist the court you are providing a completed version of the DQ and ask that the filing and serving of the same is dispensed with i.e. it means you don't have to re-file and re-serve on the other side the DQ as the court and claimant will already have a copy.

          Yes fee is always payable in advance. No fee means no application being processed.

          In question 3 of the N244, you probably want to say something along the lines of the below:

          The court has struck out the defence on the basis that the Defendant did not file his/her directions questionnaire. The Defendant seeks an order to set aside the strike out and reinstate the defence because:

          (1) The Defendant never received the Directions Questionnaire from the Court; and
          (2) in any event, the Defendant has reason to believe that the Court has failed to comply with CPR 26.3 (7A) in that the Court did not serve a further notice requiring the Defendant to comply within 7 days.
          If you want any feedback on your N244 or Witness Statement, I suggest you post up a redacted draft version on here and one of us will try to look at it.
          If you have a question about the voluntary termination process, please read this guide first, as it should have all the answers you need. Please do not hijack another person's thread as I will not respond to you
          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
          LEGAL DISCLAIMER
          Please be aware that this is a public forum and is therefore accessible to anyone. The content I post on this forum is not intended to be legal advice nor does it establish any client-lawyer type relationship between you and me. Therefore any use of my content is at your own risk and I cannot be held responsible in any way. It is always recommended that you seek independent legal advice.

          Comment


          • #6
            And thank you again.

            Comment

            View our Terms and Conditions

            LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

            If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


            If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
            Working...
            X