Please can you help, I have raised a small claim against FIAT, the reason being that I was unable to use my motorhome for 5 weeks due to a recall notice. The court has asked on what legal ground have I set my claim. My thoughts are that I paid £41,000 for a 3 month old vehicle, complete with a 2 year warranty to be able to use as and when I wished. Due to the recall notice, I was told that the parts were not available for 5 weeks and that because of the risk of fire, I was not to use the motorhome, leaving me stranded in Germany. My claim is based on what it would have cost to rent the same motorhome from a local dealer. I was provided with a car but no replacement motorhome that ruined our holidays.
Is the fact that as I paid for a nearly new vehicle, with warranty and the base vehicle (and recall notice) was FIAT, that the contract was to provide a vehicle 'Fit for purpose' and not one that could not be used without a replacement vehicle as and when a recall notice happens?
Appreciate any advice that would assist in wording my response to the court correctly and help against the legal service of such a big company.
James
Is the fact that as I paid for a nearly new vehicle, with warranty and the base vehicle (and recall notice) was FIAT, that the contract was to provide a vehicle 'Fit for purpose' and not one that could not be used without a replacement vehicle as and when a recall notice happens?
Appreciate any advice that would assist in wording my response to the court correctly and help against the legal service of such a big company.
James
Comment