• Welcome to the LegalBeagles Consumer and Legal Forum.
    Please Register to get the most out of the forum. Registration is free and only needs a username and email address.
    REGISTER
    Please do not post your full name, reference numbers or any identifiable details on the forum.

Discussion thread no. 78

Collapse
Loading...
This thread is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lgfa92
    replied
    Re: Previously posted, removal notice

    Originally posted by Indebt View Post
    LGFA

    The authority would not be allowed to go for a committal hearing until an attachment had been considered. Case law has determined this.
    Which case in particular are you referring to ?

    Craig

    Leave a comment:


  • Milo
    replied
    Re: Previously posted, removal notice

    Originally posted by Henti View Post
    The way I thought this worked and please correct me if I am wrong,is that a committal hearing in the first instance had to do a test of means to ascertain if the debtor has enough to repay. As well as to commit the court has the power to write off the debt entirely of course.

    It seems to be sense to me that the court assertions that the debtor has means before condoning any kind of further enforcement ,including AOEs.
    In the first instances, this young lady will NOT ever be a candidate for commital.

    I have often spoken of how rare it is for a person to be sent to prison but unfortunately, I was proved dreadfully wrong two weeks ago after attending a conference where approx 80 local authorities were represented. Most surprisingly, many of them reported that they have frequent commital hearings with reports of quite a large number of debtors actually being sent to prison. I was certainly suprised at the numbers reported.

    Before getting to such a stage of recovery, the local authority MUST demonstrate that they had tried all other forms of enforcement first. (Bailiffs, attatchment against earnings/benefits etc).

    Also, if a person is seen to be making a payment proposal (obviously not a £1 per week), then once again, commital cannot be a consideration.

    Leave a comment:


  • Henti
    replied
    Re: Previously posted, removal notice

    The way I thought this worked and please correct me if I am wrong,is that a committal hearing in the first instance had to do a test of means to ascertain if the debtor has enough to repay. As well as to commit the court has the power to write off the debt entirely of course.

    It seems to be sense to me that the court assertions that the debtor has means before condoning any kind of further enforcement ,including AOEs.

    Leave a comment:

View our Terms and Conditions

LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.

If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.


If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.
Working...
X