yup Pt2537 is here now too

[mahargrisch]

Re: Alexandra Slater v Egg Banking Plc August 9th 2010

I recently joined this forum because like many others I have debt problems which after a couple of years of twisting and turning I wanted to gain control of.
I like many others, in seeking information, flit from one forum to another following links and threads but felt that LB was the forum with the most informed and helpful contributors.
I realised that forums only exist on donations and joined for life.
I have not posted too many replies as I felt that I had no experience and needed to research and seek advice.
I have started a couple of threads and was blown over by the generous help I have received in particular from Pandora, Middenmiss and Mike770.
However I have seen in the past few days those very people who attracted me to this forum and were offering such good advice to others before I joined and who have so much experience become embroiled in this event.
So much so that new members who are seeking help are being ignored.To this end I have even started replying to posts using the little knowledge(not only a bad thing but also dangerous) to point them to previous threads or judgements that I have studied.
I am begging you all to do what you do best and share your experience and knowledge to benefit those who need it now.
Please stop wasting your time on what has gone before and concentrate on the good you can do in the future.
Remember some of those you help now will be passing your knowledge to others in years to come .

[LuggerBugs]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Tell you what... we could try sending Peter to Coventry. Simply ignore everything the wee ****e says.

Or is that being a little childish?

[middenmess]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Tell you what... we could try sending Peter to Coventry. Simply ignore everything the wee ****e says.

Or is that being a little childish?

Probably no need to---from PT's post on CAG.....

peter you really have got your wish, i shall be moving on and asking for the closure of my account in due course

I shall also be looking closely at your comments, and taking this to Defamation solicitors to seek a view on possible action to prohibit you from openly attacking me in the nasty manner you exhibit here

-

[Sapphire]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

PT I am pm'ing you.

What I would say to everyone is (in PIL as in my way so excuse how I say it), please, please can everyone leave their petty squabbles at the door, everyone is here ultimately for the same reason and that is if you all need reminding to give or get help against those who are trying to take the **** out of you, whether its financially or just by taking liberties.

I have never and nor has anyone on the team at Beagles ever advocated closing a thread because of sniping or petty squabbles, as none of us want to be heavy handed which does seem to be done on other forums, but if it does continue then I shall be speaking to admin and the other team members about just that idea.

I have to say that never have I been so ashamed and disgusted by the behaviour that I have witnessed here and it saddens me to the bottom of my heart.

Now lets get back to the matter in hand and start helping each other and stop this stupidity.

Rant over.

[LuggerBugs]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

What's the point? I can understand how frustrating it must be to have virtually every post you make knocked just for the sake of it by someone whose need to massage their own ego far exceeds their ability to string together a coherent sentence.

As if that weren't enough, the poor guy has to put up with snidey and nasty libel on other forums where, to be perfectly honest, the poster should know better, especially when at least one of those forums is meant for PROFESSIONAL debate.

All that happens then is a constant battle develops to try to remain calm and professional in your own approach. And I can see how that must be very wearing.

No, if PT needs time out from all this crap, I say let him go. It's his sanity that is suffering under the onslaught after all, and nobody should have to put up with being stalked all over the internet like he has. If it was me, I'd probably have been hard pushed not to go round for a visit and sort things out face to face. Much respect for the restraint that PT has shown.

It's hard turning the other cheek against a playground bully, and IMVHO, I'm afraid that's the category I put Peterbard in.

[Angry Cat]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

PT I am pm'ing you.

What I would say to everyone is (in PIL as in my way so excuse how I say it), please, please can everyone leave their petty squabbles at the door, everyone is here ultimately for the same reason and that is if you all need reminding to give or get help against those who are trying to take the **** out of you, whether its financially or just by taking liberties.

I have never and nor has anyone on the team at Beagles ever advocated closing a thread because of sniping or petty squabbles, as none of us want to be heavy handed which does seem to be done on other forums, but if it does continue then I shall be speaking to admin and the other team members about just that idea.

I have to say that never have I been so ashamed and disgusted by the behaviour that I have witnessed here and it saddens me to the bottom of my heart.

Now lets get back to the matter in hand and start helping each other and stop this stupidity.

Rant over.

Sapphire, with the greatest of respect, this matter can hardly be described as a petty squabble.

More like an unjustified character assassination, but the assassin is allowed to go free.

If you decide to ban me, then go ahead.

[leclerc]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Sapphire, with the greatest of respect, this matter can hardly be described as a petty squabble.

More like an unjustified character assassination, but the assassin is allowed to go free.

If you decide to ban me, then go ahead.

Saffy specifically used the words, CLOSE THIS THREAD cos on LB only SPAMMERS usually get banned so once you start to post porn then you'll get banned, but PM this links first

[Sapphire]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Sapphire, with the greatest of respect, this matter can hardly be described as a petty squabble.

More like an unjustified character assassination, but the assassin is allowed to go free.

If you decide to ban me, then go ahead.

AC

I take your comments on board, I really do, but I am not in the habit of banning anyone, unless as Leclerc suggests you start posting links to porn on the site then I shall do.

If you have a problem with another member please contact Admin and they will talk to you about it.

Please remember though Leclerc lives on his own and can do with all the help he can get :okay:

[The Debt Star]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

One question for Peter. You keep saying folks have been damaged/harmed by this case failing, but why should that be? They now have to end their disputes (presumably all interest and charges were suspended during legitimate disputes) and they resume repayment plans with Egg? Or is that wrong?

[Amy]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Sapphire, with the greatest of respect, this matter can hardly be described as a petty squabble.

More like an unjustified character assassination, but the assassin is allowed to go free.

If you decide to ban me, then go ahead.

But it was a squabble on another forum that was brought over here and the sniping continued. Now two members (not just one) have evidently left the forum, so clearly the numerous requests to desist should have been heeded.

[The Debt Star]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

But it was a squabble on another forum that was brought over here and the sniping continued. Now two members (not just one) have evidently left the forum, so clearly the numerous requests to desist should have been heeded.

You'll be pleased to know the fight has moved back next door and won't appear to darken this site's doorstep again (although you may hear it through the wall)
http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk...king-Plc/page9

[Amy]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

[Angry Cat]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

No you won't Debt Star, the thread has now been closed; bl**dy good job too!

No doubt, PB will re-commence his ramblings on another forum?

Addendum: not on here, I hope.

[WendyB]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Angry Cat, can't you just do as has been asked about a million times this week and just leave it at the door. PT and PB have obviously had their run ins, but as has been said on more than one occasion that started elsewhere and shouldn't have been allowed to carry on over here. Now it would appear that both PT and PB have left so, no matter whose camp people were previously in it would be as well to put the lid on it. Sniping and snidy remarks about the perceived baddy, whoever you think it may have been, only serve to prolong it all.

I for one am fed up of it and if them leaving means and end to all the arguing and bad feeling, which we never had before, then I'm glad they've gone, although their experience and advice will be missed.

[Angry Cat]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Angry Cat, can't you just do as has been asked about a million times this week and just leave it at the door. PT and PB have obviously had their run ins, but as has been said on more than one occasion thtas started elsewhere and shouldn't have been allowed to carry on over here. Now it would appear that both PT and PB have left so, no matter whose camp people were previously in it would be as well to put the lid on it. Sniping and snidy remarks about the perceived baddy, whoever you think it mayt have been, only serve to prolong it all.

I for one am fed up of it and if them leaving means and end to all the arguing and bad feeling, which we never had before, then I'm glad they've gone, although their experience and advive will be missed.

Thanks for that, Wendy!

My post was in response to this:
http://www.legalbeagles.info/forums/...&postcount=321

Rather like shooting the messanger, isn't it?

Incidentally and for the avoidance of doubt, I joined LB because of the Lowell incident only!