yup Pt2537 is here now too

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Hi

Pointless theorising really.
I dont know if this is a factor or just me getting above myself but if it makes a difference i promise not to comment or refer to the judgement either here or on any forum if it is posted this weekend for say at least a month.
People need to see this

Peter

[righty]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

PT is there ANY possibility it was a set-up meant to discredit such claims?

[seriously fed up]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

PT, you have suggested that Ms Slater, when she went on to the witness stand, told a different version of events than was contained in the witness statement, and in her discussiions with her legal team. Two questions

1. how significant do you consider this was in the final judgement?
2. why would she do this? One can only assume that this is a woman of at least normal intelligence and that she would know that this is hardly going to help the chances of her case being successful. This seems extremely odd to me.

[Budgie]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

PT are you going to be posting up a copy of the approved Slater V Egg judgment this evening or do we have to wait until Tuesday ?

I, for one, would rather see a copy of the full approved judgment rather than a summary!

[Budgie]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

AC

It gets worse...read this appeal in Brandon

Legal Beagles Consumer Forum

Please does anyone have a link to or a copy of the original judgment from the lower court in the Brandon case?

[Angry Cat]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

How curious, that Egg would send out these letters prior to the approved judgement being handed down?

[pt2537]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

we do have the full approved judgment in the office,

I have a draft judgment, here with me, but i would prefer to provide the full judgment from the approved copy, as there may well be inaccuracies in my copy

[Angry Cat]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

I expect Egg have copies they'd be more than happy to publicise on these sites.

The full judgement or, just selected parts?

[Amethyst]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

im quite surprised Egg are referring to it already as we only received the approved judgment ourselves today

I am obviously still going back over the case and in talks with the insurers etc,

I will address the questions shortly and will write a summary of the case etc.

oops crossed posts PT. Thanks that would be useful.

Saw someone had received a letter from their 'lawyers' who are dropping an egg case, quoting Slater v Egg on the 20th August too.
( Unenforeable Credit Agreements - CAG )

[Amethyst]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Well, worth a shot on Tuesday then AC ? Otherwise I expect Egg have copies they'd be more than happy to publicise on these sites.

[pt2537]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

im quite surprised Egg are referring to it already as we only received the approved judgment ourselves today

I am obviously still going back over the case and in talks with the insurers etc,

I will address the questions shortly and will write a summary of the case etc.

[righty]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Consumer credit legislation was brought in to protect consumers and try and prevent creditors from carrying on as they pleased. Creditors however often decided to do as they liked anyway and the judges are just giving it the rubber stamp.

Methinks that in order to get some of the lower orders of the judiciary to behave we are going to have to go down the political lobbying route & Vince Cable might be a good start.

Just think of it as a way of punishing the money lenders (as he wants to do) in such a way it gives the coalition government political cover "its not us gov its the law init":tinysmile_grin_t:

[Angry Cat]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Case No: 9CC00161/MC684
is that the right case number for Slater v Egg ?

All enquies have to go through Wrexham. However, the court is now closed until after the Bank Holiday:
http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/H...E70231CCA5F7AF

[Luminol]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

Sorry to butt in, just found this thread, just want to say hello to PT, you helped me in the past a great deal, so its good to see you over here.

Best Wishes Lumi x

[righty]

Re: yup Pt2537 is here now too

No wonder you are bitter Paul. I was able to provide plenty of help on the Northern Ireland Court system, knowledge which was sadly lacking on GAG. It's their loss if the want to sell their souls for 20 pieces of silver. I mote Rory doesn't post his insight into Scottish Law any more either.

In fairness to the members of GAG I did get plenty of good advice from the members but sadly the Mods/Owners need to realise what side their bread is buttered on. Andy B and Jimmy C are true FAT cats in every sense of the

word.

Great ODC perhaps you can provide a little insight to what a civil recovery victim can or should do if accused of shoplifting by the Civil Recovery threat monkeys

PS be careful we know for a fact they read this forum so PM me if you wish