atticus yes this is her. At the time she said it I believe she intended the money to be included in her will for the grandchildren, but obviously that won’t be case now under intestacy. Yes, she could have removed it, or he could. I guess there’s no legal directive in place to force him to check and confirm….so any other beneficiary would be at the mercy of his honesty.
Suspicious that a Will cannot be found. What next?
Collapse
Loading...
X
-
Hi all, just wanted to keep you up to date with this, as I feel I'm nearly at the end of the road and I won't let this drag on in a stalemate.
Deed Of Variation sent to spouse and a reminder letter to make a decision (sign or not sign) 2 weeks ago. No response.
Same letter requested confirmation of any cash inside my late mother's safe. As above, no response.
Administrating solicitor will not contact him regarding the above or indeed even request him to consider me funding another RICS valuation. Everything other than agreeing to the original intestate must now go through a different solicitor.
Different solicitor can review the letters sent and write to the spouse on my behalf (at of course 3 hours fees), but for what gain? I guess he's within his rights not to reply, so nothing will be gained and 600 quid lost. If he does reply and just says no to DOV, no to RICS and no to cash I'd at least know exactly where I stand. Is there any point in me asking a solicitor to write if there's no way to force a reply (and certainly no legal recourse for me)?
Comment
-
It is possible that the fact that you have paid a solicitor to write may persuade the recipient that you are serious and that he should therefore engage. But this is not certain.Lawyer (solicitor) - retired from practice, now supervising solicitor in a university law clinic. I do not advise by private message.
Guides and handbooks for Litigants in Person - :
https://legalbeagles.info/forums/for...60#post1701560
Comment
-
off topic … Why do most solicitors seemingly refuse to consider CFA/NWNF for a Proven/fully evidenced CCA 1974 s. 140B continuing UR claim? Is Claimant doing summat wrong? ThanksOriginally posted by atticus View PostIt is possible that the fact that you have paid a solicitor to write may persuade the recipient that you are serious and that he should therefore engage. But this is not certain.
Comment
-
Not only off topic but entirely unrelated to this forum, which is about Wills,Probate and Bereavement. Please start your own thread and provide more details.Originally posted by D_Notuse View Post
off topic … Why do most solicitors seemingly refuse to consider CFA/NWNF for a Proven/fully evidenced CCA 1974 s. 140B continuing UR claim? Is Claimant doing summat wrong? Thanks [ATTACH]temp_47304_1778775589298_488[/ATTACH]All opinions expressed are based on my personal experience. I am not a lawyer and do not hold any legal qualifications.
- 1 thank
Comment
View our Terms and Conditions
LegalBeagles Group uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience and to create a secure and effective website. By using this website, you are consenting to such use.To find out more and learn how to manage cookies please read our Cookie and Privacy Policy.
If you would like to opt in, or out, of receiving news and marketing from LegalBeagles Group Ltd you can amend your settings at any time here.
If you would like to cancel your registration please Contact Us. We will delete your user details on request, however, any previously posted user content will remain on the site with your username removed and 'Guest' inserted.



Comment