I've read of a few cases where the witnessing process was pretty lax at best, but the attestation was still considered valid. Does anyone know just how critical it is that every requirement is nailed down, or the consequences of it not being? Any examples?
I understand the attestation process should involve:
1) At least two witnesses are required.
2) The witnesses should at least 'know' it is a Will that they are signing. (Is that actually the case?)
3) The testator signs their Will, and both witnesses must be present and observe this taking place. (That's pretty essential)
4) Each witness then takes it in turn to sign their witness section, whilst themselves being witnessed by - at least - the testator, but not essentially by the other witness?
And min age of 18, not being blind or drunk, of sound mind, not a beneficiary, etc etc.
Which of the above - or anything else - is 'critical'?
Thanks.
I understand the attestation process should involve:
1) At least two witnesses are required.
2) The witnesses should at least 'know' it is a Will that they are signing. (Is that actually the case?)
3) The testator signs their Will, and both witnesses must be present and observe this taking place. (That's pretty essential)
4) Each witness then takes it in turn to sign their witness section, whilst themselves being witnessed by - at least - the testator, but not essentially by the other witness?
And min age of 18, not being blind or drunk, of sound mind, not a beneficiary, etc etc.
Which of the above - or anything else - is 'critical'?
Thanks.




Comment