Hi,
I am in the process of taking a small claim to court against T-Mobile. I took out an 18 month contract with them and my final bill included a bogus amount as a final settlement cost (an additional £32.00 on top of my monthly plan).
I contacted them and explained I would stop my direct debit until they sent me out the correct bill. They agreed but later I was referred to a debt collection agency and T Mobile refused to discuss the account as it was no longer their debt. I paid the amount in full and the made a small claim against T Mobile for falsely adding the amount plus some compenstation. They settled the claim in full including compensation. I assumed that was the end of the matter.
Unfortunately, I applied for a mortgage earlier this year which was turned down on the basis of the default on my credit report very kindly put there by T-Mobile. I contacted them and demanded that they take this off. They wrote and agreed to deal with the matter as a point of urgency and the phone conversation was positive. Alas the default has not been corrected and I had to get my mortgage at a poorer rate with a different lender costing me around £2000 more. This is the amount I am claiming.
Since then T Mobile were asked to pay me the full amount as they had not adhered to the terms and conditions of the court (ironic really) and their paperwork was not submitted in time. I was instructed by the court to apply for the funds as they had not filed a defence with the court. I did that and now T Mobile want their defence reinstating at a preliminary hearing called for the 20th of Feb and are refusing to pay.
My questions are 2 fold:
1. Can they get this defence reinstated? It was my understanding that if a deadline had passed then the judgement was made in the favour of the claimant as I have been advised by the court. What possible reason can there be for allowing them to reinstate their defence and what can my counter argument be?
2. Can I win? I have very little on paper as the original clashes took place 3 years ago. I have a record of their cheque being paid into my account (original small claim), I have my credit history (perfect except for their default), I have the letter saying they would fix the issue asap, I have emails stating why my mortgage application was turned down from my mortgage advisor and I have asked them for all correspondences sent to me since 2009.
Their defence seems to hinge on the fact that by cancelling my direct debit I broke the terms and conditions of my contract. My argument is that it cannot be expected for a consumer to pay any bill for any amount calculated in error presented regardless of whether they were in a contract or not. I was happy to pay the true bill but not happy to pay the additional charges wrongly levied to my account.
Sorry for long post! It's my first time!! And any help would be very gratefully received!
I am in the process of taking a small claim to court against T-Mobile. I took out an 18 month contract with them and my final bill included a bogus amount as a final settlement cost (an additional £32.00 on top of my monthly plan).
I contacted them and explained I would stop my direct debit until they sent me out the correct bill. They agreed but later I was referred to a debt collection agency and T Mobile refused to discuss the account as it was no longer their debt. I paid the amount in full and the made a small claim against T Mobile for falsely adding the amount plus some compenstation. They settled the claim in full including compensation. I assumed that was the end of the matter.
Unfortunately, I applied for a mortgage earlier this year which was turned down on the basis of the default on my credit report very kindly put there by T-Mobile. I contacted them and demanded that they take this off. They wrote and agreed to deal with the matter as a point of urgency and the phone conversation was positive. Alas the default has not been corrected and I had to get my mortgage at a poorer rate with a different lender costing me around £2000 more. This is the amount I am claiming.
Since then T Mobile were asked to pay me the full amount as they had not adhered to the terms and conditions of the court (ironic really) and their paperwork was not submitted in time. I was instructed by the court to apply for the funds as they had not filed a defence with the court. I did that and now T Mobile want their defence reinstating at a preliminary hearing called for the 20th of Feb and are refusing to pay.
My questions are 2 fold:
1. Can they get this defence reinstated? It was my understanding that if a deadline had passed then the judgement was made in the favour of the claimant as I have been advised by the court. What possible reason can there be for allowing them to reinstate their defence and what can my counter argument be?
2. Can I win? I have very little on paper as the original clashes took place 3 years ago. I have a record of their cheque being paid into my account (original small claim), I have my credit history (perfect except for their default), I have the letter saying they would fix the issue asap, I have emails stating why my mortgage application was turned down from my mortgage advisor and I have asked them for all correspondences sent to me since 2009.
Their defence seems to hinge on the fact that by cancelling my direct debit I broke the terms and conditions of my contract. My argument is that it cannot be expected for a consumer to pay any bill for any amount calculated in error presented regardless of whether they were in a contract or not. I was happy to pay the true bill but not happy to pay the additional charges wrongly levied to my account.
Sorry for long post! It's my first time!! And any help would be very gratefully received!


Comment